Dwight Qawi v. Tommy Burns and Mickey Walker?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Jun 30, 2017.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    This content is protected


    Burns footwork is too quick.
    He has great balance, great distance control, and knows how to use clever angles, constantly on his toes, looking for positioning. And he can hit pretty well.

    Qawi's high volume punch style will give Burns a good challenge.
    But Tommy KO's him.
     
    Reason123 likes this.
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Lol. Yeah, we're the ones wearing science fiction goggles... :facepalm:
     
    richdanahuff likes this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,686
    46,328
    Feb 11, 2005
    Head to head or in that mythic resume sense? Because no, I think a fading Matthew Saad Muhammad kicks the sh*t out of a fading Marvin Hart.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Of course he does. :meparto:
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,686
    46,328
    Feb 11, 2005
    Again. How hard is it to look good against Billy Squires, a guy who would win only 1 of his remaining 10 fights.
     
  6. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    Admitting it is the first step to recovery.

     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2017
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    He had 1 loss going into the fight.
    Tommy washed him in seconds in beautiful fashion.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,686
    46,328
    Feb 11, 2005
    A) Tell me more about all this victims previous to Burns. They all seem to be household names.

    B) Have you actually watched this footage?
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Have you?
     
    Reason123 likes this.
  10. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    Ahh, classic modernists. Strawmen for days.
     
    reznick likes this.
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Meanwhile, you're riding with the same delusional weirdos who think Primo Carnera was better than Riddick Bowe, and who think that world-class 230-lb sluggers from the 1990s would be hopelessly outmatched against Jim Corbett. :pancarta:
     
    richdanahuff likes this.
  12. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    Ahh, more strawman. Whatever keeps you believing in the dream of 240 pound super athletes my friend. With amazing skill and speed. Truly some wonderful science fiction.

     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Strange. Your comments and replies seem to have little to nothing to do with anything that anyone has actually written. Maybe you're in the wrong thread? Or maybe you don't know what a strawman is? Either way, fun as it's been, going back and forth with you seems like a complete waste of time. :wave:
     
  14. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    So me bringing up your delusional weirdo beliefs. After you bring up mine has nothing to do with what anyone has written? Cute. Oh well back to your safe space then.

     
    reznick likes this.
  15. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,492
    13,046
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected