Dwyer: "Hopkins or Tarver can beat Wlad"

That's okay sweetie, don't let my words get any sand in your vagina. I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.................:yep

It's not "news" that I'm a fan of the Klitsckos and Heavyweight boxing in general. Y'know the best part? Being right and that happens a lot for me. When I'm wrong I admit it too, like I said Wlad would KO Haye and it went to a decision after a not so spectacular affair. I gave Haye props for his head & upper body movement & I said it limited Wlad's offensive attack because he wasn't landing the jab as effectively as he usually does. I'm sure more than 1 poster here can vouge for that.................

 

Careful, or ***run will call you a gay Klitschko fan........................

 

That´s what I recalled too. So all in all, since Hopkins knows boxing, we can say that Dwyer doesn´t. Right?

 

Fu** Dwyer. Seriously I am sick of him coming up with the most ridiculous hypothesis imaginable and then passing them off as objective facts.

Not even going to watch that.

... will probably watch tomorrow just so I ruin my day.

 

Dwyer banned me from his channel for constructively criticizing his record.

 

Dwyer is not saying Hopkins or Tarver would beat Klitschko. He's providing arguments for a hype train.

If something like Tarver-Hopkins at cruiserweight were to happen, then at that point, if one of them emerged as the decisive winner he might be talked about as a challenger to Wlad (not right away, but down the line). The winner of that fight would probably be given more of a shot of beating Wlad than an Arreola or a Chisora.

But i dunno if targeting Klitschko would be the way to go---Dwyer is thinking about the cash windfall but there are other attractions in boxing besides the Klitschkoes. Given their ages, maybe the winner of that fight should target Holyfield. Or Haye or Adamek if they are up for a challenge. Not Klitschko.

 

P4P, Hopkins simply toys with Wlad in the worst way imaginable. But as it stands, Wlad is just way too big for Hopkins. Even Hopkins said Wlad is just too big in several occassions.

 

I recently ended my subscription to Dwyer's page on YouTube. This kind of **** makes me glad I did. He's a moron in many ways.

 

no

 

If you watch Dwyers predictions (regarding Klitschkos) in chronological order, one can observe a gradual increase of crazyness.

- Insisting that Vitalis punch didn't connect with Solis' temple despite contrary evidence

- explaining that Haye transcends / transforms boxing or some **** and comparing him to Ali


Seriously, what's his problem?


Right now, I wouldn't be suprised if in his next video he explained why De La Hoya or N. Hamed vs. Klitschko would be a competitive fight.

 

Imagine a scenario with Hopkins having all of the same attributes, skills, and speed he had in his PEAK, only in a heavyweight body at whatever height Wladimir is...absolute schooling It would be a masterpiece.

 

And people take gambling advice from this clown?

 

I know. A basic, predictable, straight up Euro like Wlad would be someone Hopkins can school with one hand behind his back. Just an utter mismatch. He would take away Wlad's right so badly it's not even funny.

 

I used to think Wlad was a straight up Euro, but he's not.

He's a much better fighter than that, it and it would be harder than expected.

 

The dumbest idea Dwyer has in this video has nothing to do with Klitschko; it's that Hopkins-Tarver would be a premium fight that would be much more attractive to fans and networks than Hopkins-Dawson and would be more significant for Hopkins' legacy atsch