http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYqyaTnoRb8 love this guy...he's more often right than not....but even when he isnt...his observations are still generally legit & awesome , quite detailed.. He knows his **** for sure. He was right with his Taylor vs Froch predicition... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3_auPJXUjg & here's some thoughts on calzaghe vs froch.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8dIWoF3qDw
You can know everything about boxing, have all Sugar Ray Robinson fights on DVD and still suck at making predictions. After all it comes down to judgement, not so much knowledge.
He used the term "spirited shoot out." That ain't gonna happen because Klitschko doesn't get into slugging matches. Claiming that Dave Haye doesn't have tony Thompson's skill set is just plain wrong. This guy is talking out his ass.
is he talking out of his ass whenever he contradicts your personal opinion or just in general ? He generally hits the nail on the head with most of his predicitions. But like he says himself..."anything can happen" , that's for sure.
He's a *****. He made about 10 videos whining about how Hopkins was 'robbed' against Calzaghe. He thinks Hopkins won the first 8 rounds. What a douche.
He is "talking out his ass' whenever he is factually wrong. His analysis of Carl Froch's style was not only wrong it was laughable. Maybe this joker correctly predicted the outcome but Froch came within 14 seconds of losing. Froch got lucky and so did Dwyer.
The problem with comparing Haye's strategy to Brewster is that Haye has a Glass Jaw and could not take the punishment Brewster did in the first fight. If that was Haye in there instead of Brewster in 2004 he would not have lasted 2 rounds. Lamon took some huge shots. Haye's ONLY chance is a blitzkrieg like Sanders did.
No **** , but isn't everybody ? You're just pointing the obvious... But the fight hasn't happened yet though. So how can you claim that he's "factually" wrong ? Is that a fact ? If so , why aren't you betting all the money you have in your bank account on Haye by KO ? And how was his analisis of Froch laughable ?
I'll give you that Rico. But Haye has a far better defence than 'Relentless' Lamon. His upper body reflexes and lateral movement are quick and often under-rated.
I like this guy his analysis is not always your run of the mill **** you hear from every other boxing novice with a camera.
