Dylan Whyte has a stronger resume than Deontay Wilder

It's too easy imo.
Still strange why Ortiz didn't receive that kind of attention after getting knocked down before.
If you are 100% right everyone who is knocked down should receive that.

 

i'm fairly sure it was the DeGale/Jack fight that i first noticed it, and thought it was odd, but then looked into it and that was apparently why. i still believe, however, that if it was Wilder beating on Ortiz the same way Ortiz was beating on Wilder, the fight would've definitely been stopped

 

Browne and Helenius?
I dont get this forums obsession with Browne. Dude was a club level fighter who got a lucky break vs an old, out of shape Chagaev.
And we all know Helenius is shot.

And Whyte got KTFO by Joshua.

Wilder has: Stiverne, Szpilka, Molina, Duhaupas, Washington, Scott, Price, Liakhovich, Harrison and Ortiz.
Ortiz being the only legitimate top 10 contender. The rest are either borderline 20 or lower, but there is quality in numbers.
If you take Wilder's WBC title away, then he has pretty damn good resume for a contender.

Whyte himself has wins over Allen and Lewison which are overlooked.

 

Why do you want Wilder to fight Whyte so badly? If you know anything about boxing, you would know Wilder sends Dillian to the hospital on a stretcher.

Are we going to start arguing that Jenner is ducking Chisora? Because this is the same kind of spastic logic that we're dealing with here.

Wilder was going to fight that fat overrated slobber who was 20 seconds away from getting packed in by Parker, providing he could get his hands on Jenner, which you already know. That was until Eddie said he couldn't promise him a fight with his slave.

 

Eat a muffin mate!

 

Wilders best wins are Duhaupas, Stiverne I and Ortiz, those are his only good wins by the way.

Washington and Szpilka were overrated and have shown in their last fights how average they really are.
Stiverne II was a farce.

So Wilder has a Top 15 win in Duhaupas, a borderline Top 10 win in Stiverne and a Top 5 win in Luis Ortiz.

Whyte has beaten Chisora, Helenius, Browne and Parker.

Whyte vs Chisora could have been a draw as best case scenario for Chisora, Whyte won that fight imo.

Some of you guys thought Browne would beat Dillian Whyte and had him in their Top 10s before the fight, i never did and we all know what happened, he also beat Parker clearly with 115-111 or 114-112 in my opinion.

So Whyte has a Top 20 win in Helenius, two Top 15 wins in Browne and Chisora and he has a borderline Top 5 win
in Parker, which is arguable because Parker is probably more a Top 10 guy.

Wilders resume is better but not by much and if you consider the fact that he fought almost double the amount of
fights, it really isn't anything to brag about.

 

Yep, but then again Dave Allen comes close to matching Wilder's resume

 

You do you dishonest little liar, that's why you're in here trying to talk up a fighter who lost against Chisora and should have got knocked out by Parker were it not for the fact that the ref picked him up off the floor so he could continue.

We do know Wilder knocks out Whyte, because he has no defence, no stamina and isn't on Wilder's level.

We don't need to find out if Jenner is capable of stopping CHisora do we now? Why? Because as boxing analysis's we've seen through experience what Chisora's level is compared to AJ's and know without doubt that it would mostly likely be a mismatch.

Not worth the investment in time watching unless you want to see a one sided beating and more brain damage delivered to an already punch drunk fighter.

 

Look at these moronic hypocrites complaining about the wilder ortiz fight and the ref

Where were these same posters complaining about the obvious hatchet job favoritism given towards Whyte against Parker

This content is protected