Eddie Chambers challenges Anthony Joshua

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Leoh, Jan 4, 2015.


  1. zeratul

    zeratul Active Member Full Member

    1,294
    364
    Nov 18, 2013
    I am pretty sure he will be losing to any decent fighters that is why they keep him fighting bums for so long. Eddie still seems boring to me no matter how dedicatedly he promotes himself on twitter.
     
  2. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,383
    131,781
    Jul 21, 2009
    Hughie Fury knocked Chambers out in sparring not that long ago. Chambers was so out of it Clifton Mitchell and Tyson Fury had to assist him out of the ring. That's why Chambers has been fighting Slovakian bartenders of late and why Hughie's handlers are so confident of sticking him in with the dangerous Rudenko, which even if he wasn't coming off a long lay off due to serious illness would still be a huge leap up in class for him and a risky fight.
     
  3. zeratul

    zeratul Active Member Full Member

    1,294
    364
    Nov 18, 2013
    Proof?
     
  4. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,383
    131,781
    Jul 21, 2009

    Send Eddie a PM and he'll tell you it's true too (He posts on here under the user name Team_Chambers in case you didn't know).
     
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,202
    27,915
    Jan 18, 2010
    I've always liked Eddie but he has become a bumbasher since he signed on to team Fury.
    At this point I actually favor a green AJ over him.
     
  6. sir axeman

    sir axeman Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,307
    159
    Jun 24, 2007
    Funny Chambers wants Joshua..but none of the Fury's do. You can make an argument for Tyson in that he's now fighting at world level and on the verge of a shot at Wlad. Hughie on the other hand is perfect...had a similar amount of fights as Joshua. Wonder why you don't hear a peep from Hughie on the possibility of a Joshua fight. Tell you why..cos they know Joshua would KO him and give him a huge career setback. Peter Fury might be willing to let Chambers have a go but he won't let his son anywhere near!
     
  7. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,338
    4
    May 2, 2014
    This fight will probably happen this year
     
  8. Clydebank Blitz

    Clydebank Blitz Don't Be Scared Homie Full Member

    1,316
    2
    Oct 11, 2011
    Bit weird of a guy like Eddie to call out someone as green as Joshua.

    Anthony just fights like Wilder and Fury anyways. Massive guy, KO power, terrible technique with lunging into shots and not covering up.
     
  9. ikeabuchia

    ikeabuchia Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,012
    22
    Aug 23, 2004
    Do not under estimate Peter fury has a trainer...I have kept my tabs on this man...very astute and precise and boxing brain knowledge is immense....simply world class make no mistake!
     
  10. Giggidy

    Giggidy Member Full Member

    211
    0
    Dec 17, 2014
    What are you smoking? Joshua would KO Chambers even this early in his career.
     
  11. MN_Logan

    MN_Logan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,513
    2
    Sep 26, 2014
    I'm a fan of Chambers, but as other people have said, I'm not too sure about him calling out a rookie when he could be trying to build up big wins for some sort of a title shot.
     
  12. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,246
    10,811
    Jun 5, 2010
    If Joshua were to take this, win or lose he gets more credit than Wilder. Eddie
    is a sly fox in the ring (at least at heavyweight)
     
  13. Maggo

    Maggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,069
    13
    Mar 18, 2011
    As more time he spends with the FURY's the more delusional he gets :patsch
     
  14. Team_Chambers

    Team_Chambers Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Dec 12, 2012
    Where did you here these Lies?:lol::lol::lol:
     
  15. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    I also think Chambers can beat Joshua at this point. Doubt Anthony takes the fight for the very same reason.