Eddie Chambers vs Tomasz Adamek

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ripple633, Feb 7, 2010.


  1. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009
    Interesting matchup between boxer vs boxer/brawler, both are small heavyweight, who do you think wins?
     
  2. uglyandproud7

    uglyandproud7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,882
    15
    Nov 15, 2009
    I think Eddie has the speed and it accustomed to big/hw punchers.
     
  3. Sardu

    Sardu RIP Mr. Bun: 2007-2012 Full Member

    3,581
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    Chambers comfortable UD
     
  4. Goose

    Goose Russian oligarch Full Member

    8,207
    5,561
    Mar 2, 2005
    Gotta pick Eddie here, too fast, too slick...
     
  5. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    After Adamek's performance last night, a much much much better version of Estrada beats Adamek, easily.
     
  6. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009

    Well we haven't seen Chambers at his best, and you know and I know what we saw against Dimitrenko wasn't at his best. Chambers could do so many things better and it's so OBVIOUS to see, that's how good he is. We'll see how well he does W.Klitschko.

    But Chambers outboxes Adamek convincingly. Too bad they won't be fighting anytime soon. Also Adamek is a natural cruiserweight, so it's understandable he started off slow at CW then become better later on. I doubt he can get accustomed fighting at 220lbs, his bone structure and size won't allow it.
     
  7. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Chambers by UD. Adamek isn't as good as Povetkin at hw and chambers is better than he was back then. He'd be landing a much higher number of clean shots.
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,141
    10,561
    Jul 28, 2009
    Could go either way. But I think Adamek would have an edge due to aggression, even if it's ineffective aggression, the judges may not bother to notice. I'd slightly favor Eddie as far as actual punches landed, the way it's supposed to be but Adamek is a determined guy, could out-hustle him or convince the judges.
     
  9. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    Not the best timing to ask this question. People should not forget that Chambers is a very inconsistent fighter and has had his share of flops. I can see how people can think Chambers is a better version of Estrada but he has nowhere near his chin.
     
  10. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    Newsflash: Adamek had a more consistent fight against Estrada than Povetkin. Povetkin was losing the first half of the fight and needed latter rounds to snatch a victory. Also dont discount the fact that a) Pov fought at HW his entire career whereas this was Adamek 2nd fight b) Estrada had short notice for the Povetkin fight.
     
  11. Ashstrodamus

    Ashstrodamus Rodney Dangerfield of ESB Full Member

    368
    1
    Jul 30, 2005
    I see Chambers winning and possibly knocking Adamek out, but I did vote UD. Eddie has fairly decent power. He rocked the hell out of Povetkin in the first few rounds. Those kind of shots might KO Tomas, or maybe even Wlad.
     
  12. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,141
    10,561
    Jul 28, 2009
    Oh did he **** me off against Povetkin. You could see punch for punch his were doing the damage and he took a tablet of fukitol about half way through the fight and gave it away.
     
  13. Aniki

    Aniki Star Puncher Full Member

    634
    0
    Aug 16, 2008
    A-****ing-men. These guys are unbelievable.
     
  14. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    They're morons reacting to a single fight like some impulsive fools. Chambers puts on a mini string of wins against a past it, already used and abused Peter and against a totally unproven, fringe contender Dimitrenko (both MDs by the way) and these guys are wetting their pants. In reality, Dimitrenko's resume was no better than Estrada's and imo Dimi is a much more crude fighter than Jason. He just had that shining zero defeats. Well that got him far. Chambers can be a technincally impressive HW from time to time but I will say he's no where near tough enough to survive Adamek.


    But fair enough, Adamek had a mediocre fight with Estrada and is getting his lumps for the momemnt. Wlad, Arreola, Chambers, Povetkin and Haye without exception all had these kind of fights (actually some were way more disastrous) and many of them against lesser opposistion and with the benefit of having more experience at HW. People tend to have a short memory.
     
  15. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    Chambers with 18 KOs is going to KO ADAMEK? Name one top ten fighter that Chambers has stopped????? You're as pitiful as your avatar.