Eddie Hearn attacks Fish Eyes on Twitter

Haha, alright Nathan!

 

are you taking the ****?

Karpency' last fight was a 6 rounder against some guy that had a record of 10 wins and 14 losses.

 

What are the chances of another wee dig tomorrow?

 

:huhHmmmmm

 

Just looking at your post history and all of your posts have been relating to Nathan Cleverly v Tommy Karpency, your first two post were made on 24/5/2011 and 20/12/2011 :think How long has this fight been in the making, or to sound more dramatic and cinematic, who are you? :scaredas:

Oh and btw Karpency is an absolutely horrible opponent for a "World Title Fight" he is not a top 50 Light Heavyweight, and what title does he have. Simples, this is a terrible terrible fight :wall

 

like i said do your homework.. karpencys last fight was not a 6 round. he crushed hemphill in round 1. ko. no surprises but this will be better than the bellew fight.

 

I JUST wish to God Amir Khan would stop bleating about his defeat to Lamont Peterson, stop playing the blame game and get on with his career.
First of all we heard moans about the referee Joe Cooper for deducting Khan two points for pushing during his world title defence — he warned him enough about it.

Now, we have this nonsense about a mystery man at ringside in Washington DC and allegations of dodgy scoring that have yet to be proved.

Let me clear up a major point here as I don't think the fight supervisor, who collates the scores, has done anything untoward. In fact I'd say it's impossible for him to have done anything wrong.

At worse, 'the man in the hat' as he has become known, could have seen the round scores but as for dabbling with them — no.

How can you interfere with all the judges' scorecards when those judges, who are NOT under scrutiny, are sitting on different sides of the ring?

Look, you get bad decisions in boxing just as you do in any other sport and, let's face it, Khan went to Washington because that's where the money was and he got beat in somebody else's backyard. Some years ago when Lennox Lewis fought Evander Holyfield for the first time in New York and it was declared a draw one of the judges was accused of all sorts.

Nothing was ever proved and I am told the judge in question was awarded a lot of libel damages for being wrongfully accused.

What does annoy me are those people who say 'Oh, that's boxing for you'.

Let me remind you that it is not boxers who are behind bars for fixing results but cricketers — you know, that game of gentlemen — and jockeys who ride in the sport of kings.

WELTERWEIGHT Kell Brook left me to get a quicker route to a world title fight, yet nearly a year later he is still to fight for one.
The word is that he could face Ricky Hatton's younger brother Matthew on March 17 in Sheffield in the 'big showcase' his promoter promised.

Last year I offered him the Interim WBO or WBA world titles or there was a world title opportunity against the beatable IBF champion light-middleweight Cornelius Bundrage.

:rasta:tong:rofl

 

This is the single biggest problem in boxing and it will always be going downhill whilst it happens - fighters with no profile fighting 3-4 times a year max. If you fight 10 times a year no one will begrudge you a 90-10 fight and a loss will do little to damage your overall career as you'll be fighting again next month.

When you only have 18-20 fights in your first 3-5 years as a pro any loss will hurt you and then when you have a profile evry fight has to be a big one.

It's my opinion that the benchmark for any young pro should be 20 fights in their first two years.