Eddie Hearn attempts to justify the decision to make Nathan Cleverly-Bellew II PPV

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Black_Rainbows, Nov 3, 2014.


Page 3 of 3
  1. mithffg

    mithffg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,816
    167
    Feb 22, 2007
    I will not be mandingoed by eddie hearn.

    BOYCOTT
     
    mithffg, Nov 4, 2014
    mithffg, Nov 4, 2014
    #31
  2. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,105
    Sep 21, 2013
    Hello Eddie!
     
    Brixton Bomber, Nov 4, 2014
    Brixton Bomber, Nov 4, 2014
    #32
  3. Sly

    Sly Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,707
    1
    Jan 2, 2007
    The Joshua and Groves appearances would work if they weren't tune up fights. Nobody outside the boxing world knows these two are even fighting on Nov 22 :patsch
     
    Sly, Nov 4, 2014
    Sly, Nov 4, 2014
    #33
  4. Dive in Derek

    Dive in Derek Member Full Member

    184
    0
    Dec 9, 2013
    I am against PPV as I think it is taking the ****.

    Hearn will continue to do it so long as mugs buy it.

    All this nonsense about it being a huge night is an insult to the Boxing fan who knows his onions.

    All one sided bores except from the main event.
     
    Dive in Derek, Nov 4, 2014
    Dive in Derek, Nov 4, 2014
    #34
  5. Bonavena25

    Bonavena25 Vamos! Full Member

    4,778
    1
    Nov 2, 2007
    What makes me laugh is the bull**** 'eliminators ' that have become common place under Hearn. When asked about it he says "well it's not a final eliminator, it's an eliminator for a final eliminator" :lol:
     
    Bonavena25, Nov 4, 2014
    Bonavena25, Nov 4, 2014
    #35
  6. big_daddy

    big_daddy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,517
    25
    Nov 28, 2013
    Sounds better than 'he's basically in a quarter final'
     
    big_daddy, Nov 4, 2014
    big_daddy, Nov 4, 2014
    #36
Page 3 of 3