Eddie Hearn confirms Joshua vs Usyk will have a rematch clause

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by xnico, Jun 16, 2021.

  1. Baneofthegame

    Baneofthegame Active Member Full Member

    899
    840
    Aug 19, 2017
    Cue all the “Hearns ruining boxing” crowd.
     
  2. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,773
    2,485
    Jun 15, 2010
    It's not standard . You are talking bs

    This is Eddie's new way of dealing. Whyte had a rematch he wasn't even the champ ffs
     
  3. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,598
    1,387
    Jun 24, 2007
    Rematch clause should always be there when your a titleholder. It’s what got him the opportunity to win back his titles from Ruiz.
     
  4. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,433
    9,586
    Jun 25, 2014
    That's why the old WBA in the 1960s banned it. From 1957 (when Patterson lost to Ingo) to 1966 -- nearly nine years - basically four men fought for the heavyweight title, because they kept exercising rematch clauses.

    Those four were Patterson, Johansson, Liston and Ali. Patterson fought Johansson three times in a row, Patterson fought Liston twice in a row, Liston fought Ali twice in a row ... then Ali fought Patterson.

    The only odd man who snuck in during those nine years was Tom McNeeley, who wasn't even highly rated, but was an optional defense by Floyd.

    At that point, so many contenders had missed out on title shots over those nine years that the WBA banned the practice when Ali won the title. Then Ali signed for a rematch with Liston, and they stripped him.

    It's easy for a couple people to monopolize a title if they keep exercising rematch clauses.
     
    sasto, Holler, Leeroy84 and 2 others like this.
  5. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,580
    2,025
    Sep 16, 2020
    This one, yeah.

    I think if Usyk had opportunity to enforce purse bid or A.J to drop belt if he will not sign rematch clause and did not had balls?

    He will be worse boxing promoter than kalle etc lads for sure.
    With honoUr and 5 m in pockets you can make more than with this eddie papers signing and collecting paychecks from eddie.
    He will not beat ref, judges and A.J twice in eddie show.

    He is done. Totally done if he had signed rematch clause.


    Usyk hype train is died if he had signed this one.
     
  6. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Active Member Full Member

    1,404
    2,318
    Jul 11, 2017
    Rematch clauses should be banned unless both parties have it with exactly the same terms.
    That would help a little.
    It's a joke of a sport though.

    For anyone defending Hearn, do you muppets not remember he recently had a rematch clause for an elimination fight? If you can't work out how absurdly corrupt that is, nobody can help you.
     
  7. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,580
    2,025
    Sep 16, 2020
    Pro boxing fans largest proportion is most stupid ppl form ALL sports fans.
    They are stupid and they need well developed and highly marketed brands - boxers with high KO % and they should look impressive vs opponents in away corner.
    Then these brands gets belts and paying customers are happy: the best boxer in universe fighting 1 X or at max 2 X per 1 calendar year in promoter's backyard and with clauses.

    LOL, and they does have belts etc decorations and clauses even in eliminators.

    " Sport " events, LOL.

    I a bit happy that YT lad vs wrestler might earn a lot of money or out of retirement boxer vs MMA lad, without belts.

    This will be future of boxing, reality = money = rules.
    Not belts, alphabet orgs etc noise.
    HOF etc other useless ****.

    Eddie should create matchroom belt, Dana at least was honest and introduced UFC belts for MMA.
    LOL.
     
  8. TFP

    TFP Member Full Member

    384
    347
    Feb 20, 2012
    Covid has slowed things down to such an extent that for the time being at least it should be banned across the board.
     
    sasto likes this.
  9. coolcat45

    coolcat45 Active Member Full Member

    535
    672
    Oct 21, 2018
    Usyk probably got compensated for the rematch clause. I am sure he would rather fight joshua and get paid rather than fight for the vacant belt especially at his age. Blame the mandatory challengers for accepting these contracts. Wlad did the same thing to fury
     
    Holler likes this.
  10. Sammy123

    Sammy123 Money Maker Staff Member

    2,030
    1,149
    Apr 15, 2015
    So if Usyk loses he can exercise a rematch clause?
     
  11. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,580
    2,025
    Sep 16, 2020
    Fury did not had fought rematch vs Wlad because he had other interests rather than boxing after first fight he had won.

    Maybe, pro boxing belts etc are papers for fans but pro boxing is about money only.
    Nothing else.

    Ruiz is A.J DAD and belts will not change this.
    Johansson had KOed Patterson and Patterson avenged loss with 2 wins in row in rematches.
    Ruiz stopped A.J and A.J thinks that he now is champion cos he does have belts and outpointed Ruiz in rematch.
    HW champion of the world cos he does have these paper entertainment belts.
    Not likely, I think only if big cash cow will loss then will be rematch.
     
  12. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 The Original 101.3 Full Member

    7,299
    8,669
    Mar 17, 2018
    Boxers in mandatory positions these day will happily sell on their right to no rematch for an exta 15/20 per cent
     
  13. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,580
    2,025
    Sep 16, 2020
    there is also thing like step aside money, some takes also this alone.

    Pro boxing is more about to entertain people and earn money.
    This is not thing about the best boxer etc sales nonsense here.


    I U are big cash cow, U even do not need any belt to earn money.
    LOL at belts and pro boxing.
     
  14. Special one

    Special one Active Member Full Member

    646
    525
    Mar 20, 2019
    Usyk mandatory for W. B. O only so rematch is justified as Joshua will be putting all the belts on the line, bringing all the ppv money and its good business for Usyk anyways!! No rematch needed tho think Usyk will get knocked out late!
     
  15. xnico

    xnico New Member banned Full Member

    695
    630
    Nov 6, 2020
    eddie hearn in the video cant give a proper response lol
     
    MarkusFlorez99 likes this.