A better win over Valuev and Ruiz?, Hell even Barrett is a better win than Fury. What has Fury done to be Haye's biggest win?, ask yourself that question and answer it.
Barrett better than Fury? No just no. Old Ruiz? Who lost 8 times before he faced Haye? Valuev? It was only a name at that time. We all know that Valuev was not any good. He good beaten by ancient Holyfield in his fight before Haye. And was a paper Champ! He only got his belt because Chagaev could not defend his belt because of injury. So Valuev got the belt by beating old Ruiz (lol) who again was not anything good at that time. Hayes heavyweight resume is ****! And fury would be a good name on his resume! Many would agree that it would be his best win! Haye fought old fighters (way over theire prime) like Valuev and Ruiz. It says all when somebody says Valuev was his best win. Shows you how crap his heavyweight resume is. Yet many HAye fans really think Haye is an exciting heavyweight who fought good and strong opposition. There are many heavyweights who have a better resume than Haye at THIS moment. But yeah Barrett was a better win.
So let me get this straight, if Valuev is a name what does this make Fury? Hell no Fury won't be Haye's biggest win. All the opponents I mentioned are proven better fighters than him, I would easily rate that past-it version of Ruiz(who got robbed against Valuev) over Fury any day of the week. By the way, it says a lot when Valuev is his biggest win because of how crap the heavyweight division is, not Haye's resume. Remember, Valuev was actually the WBA champion. Now let's put that aside for a second and twist the topic, for comedy's sake. Remember when Wladimir signed to fight him after the Barrett win? :rofl
Fury's stock could quickly implode if he gets knocked out and can't come back from that. Considering his defense is crap, his chin is soft and his footwork is a disaster I can't see how he won't get knocked out numerous times in the future.
No Ruiz got NOT robbed in the second fight against Valuev. If he was robbed then in theire first fightatsch This fight was 5 years ago, before old Ruiz faced Haye. Man you dont know anything. Did you even saw Valuev against ancient Holyfield? He was TERRIBLE! A big ass fighter who was scared of fighting! His corner said him that he needs a knock out... what did Valuev do? NOTHING! He fought Holyfield just like he fought Haye. Looking ****ing terrible. Valuev was a paper champ! First Chagaev was the real champion (Chagaev got the belt from Valuev in a time where Valuev was still good) but had to drop it. Also Valuev got a big gift against ancient Holyfield. Even his corner thought that they did not won the fight and that they needed a knock out. No Valuev was a champ on paper nothing more. It says all about Haye, not the division, when Valuev is seen as his best win by some fans. Or is it the fault of the division that Haye only fought weak opponents like Audley (LOL), Barrett, old Ruiz (again way over his prime) and old Valuev (again way over his prime). If you really think Furry would not be a good win on this weak heavyweight resume... I dont know what else to say.b But again you even said that Barrett is a better winatschAlso this is not about the Klitschkos. It is about Fury-Hayeatsch :hi:
A guy who's claiming Fury will be Haye's biggest heavyweight win to date is telling me I don't know anything. I know this isn't about the Klitschkos, I never said it was though W.Klitschko is THE champion in the division and he accepted to fight Haye after he beat Barrett, which says a lot about the division itself. Yes, Valuev is a far better win than Fury who hasn't done a single thing in the division. Not only that, but Haye went to his backyard to beat him. Surely if you think Valuev is slow then Fury must be lightning fast in comparison? :rofl
Fury is much faster than Valuev. Even that you ask this shows me you dont know anything about the Valuev who fought Haye. Valuev was just a name like Ruiz. But not a good fighter when Haye faced both. Valuev was TERRIBLE! I am done here. You even rate Barrett higher than Fury. I dont think I can change you opinion. I also dont want to. You can belive what you want. Just deal with the fact that it is Hayes fault that he has such a weak resume and it is NOT the fault of the divison. Funny I never heard such a stuipid ass excuse. There where many great fighters in this division. Yet Haye faced none of them. If you dont agree that Fury is his best win... you have to admit that it is a very good win on his weak ass resume... or not?:!: hmmm but again you rated the Barrett win higher than a possible Fury win. Ok cya.
^This is Fury who's just been dropped by a cruiserweight? I'm not saying he's not a decent prospect, but to suggest that he'd be Haye's best win at heavyweight is laughable. And that's not to say that Haye's resume at heavyweight is impressive.
Fury is too open to the right hand and we all know the power Haye has in his right hand. I think this fight will go the same way it did when Haye fought Enzo Maccarinelli.
Fury isn't Hayes best win. At heavyweight I rate Valuev as his best win and second I guess Ruiz. But Fury is still better then Audley and maybe barret.
Many great fighters in the division??? Lol' okay buddy! I'm with Scar, those guys all beat Fury at this stage of his career and likely all by ko.