said it to esnews cant post links I said it before man i so wished if brook got fights with either cotto or canelo i would favor him to beat cotto for sure at this stage and canelo is a 50-50 fight
Brook would whoop Cotto's ****, just like Williams, the Charlo's, and Andrade would. Trout already son'd Cotto.
why cotto is a tiny lmw. it just shows how weak mw is since cotto was drstroying guys like geale. id favor brook over cotto slightly
based on what a win against porter?even Brook doesn't know his on level anymore as his resume is awful.
Every day a new thread with the same nonsensical error. **** Jimmy. "The phrase should have indicates a missed obligation or opportunity in the past. In informal speech, it is contracted to should've, not "should of." I should have (should've) known you were lying. Tom and Pauline are so selfish, they should have (should've) been there for you." http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/blog/english-mistakes/should-have-vs-should-of/
So first ballot HOFer Miguel Cotto is going to get beat down by the man whose only fight worth mentioning is one where he barely got by Shawn Porter. OK.