Of course i'm right in what i'm saying in terms of US FANS. And i know Sky are a huge company which refuses to lose money, but you can tell that by just watching their shows. Their undercards are full of one sided mis-matches. There are no depth to these bills whatsoever and that's the point i'm trying to make. So i don't understand it when you say i'm confusing business with morals because as a business Hearns brand isn't good enough. Time for plan b. As i said before Dennis Hobson invested in a product which lost money at the weekend, but that was better than most of Hearns shows this year. Another thing Sky have cancelled tv deals with promoters and have reduced their boxing schedule and if you look at the last 18 months under Hearn we have had more prizefighters than British title fights so we have been stuck with that. So i wouldn't be too sure the boxing fans wont turn off no matter what. Because if the product continues to be poor who is going to pay to watch it? Even the fighters own following will suffer because they wont continue to pay £45 a whip and extra on travelling costs to go see their man in a mis match.
There you go Win Fella. You have forgot you said that because you talk soo much shite. It's OK, you don't have to thank me
I didn't think you would have the ability to contextualise that, seen as though your dumb witted Keep posting Tiger, or is it Lion? :thumbsup
I hate Frankie so much that Eddie Hearn could **** my nan and I would still like him more than Frankie.