Edwin Rosario vs Adrien Broner At 135

Not really.

 

Pin point the stupidity?

 

Lol he was no monster.Monsters don't get slapped about by Welsh midgets

 

You said you wouldn't consider someone a great LW, if their reputation was based on beating up bums. Mosley has that exact reputation as all he did was beat up men who weren't considered elite.

 

Mosley is only really considered a great lightweight on an h2h level.

 

But he's only considered a great h2h LW because of how dominant he was against inferior opposition.

 

Mosley is not considered a top tier great lightweight so it's irrelevant. He's usually ranked around the teen area (no paedo)
Anyway, for us to compare Broner to Mosley to defend our arguments is embarrassing. I'm sure you agree It's as clear as day on the eye test that Mosley was for more skilled and would put a horrendous beating on Aids Broner. Broner didn't even look that great at lightweight and had only a handful if fights.

 

I rate Mosley a lot higher than Broner.

I don't need to defend my argument though, I'm stating that Mosley has this h2h ranking due to the way he dominated inferior opposition. I'm saying given the current field of LW fighters, that is something Broner could have done himself.

 

I'd venture to say he said it because it's true.

 

Can you break it down for me then? What have you seen in either of them that leads you to believe that Broner is an easy win for him? Any fights that you find particularly revealing about how one would do against the other?

 

No one got near Camacho before he fought Rosario.

 

Off the top of my head, broner had never been vertu comfortable unless the guy came to him and he could counter. Davis had plenty of flaws but lack of mobility wasn't one of them.

 

Broner could never be a great lightweight. It would never happen because he's totally pish at boxing

 

Which LW today would you favour over him?

Or what about Mosley's LW resume, which of those would you favour over Broner?

 

At lightweight (or 130)? Which fights?