El Terrible is superior to Marco Antonio Barrera because......

come on bill butcher. i'll start because...of the rounds 1 and 12 of pac-morales 1. I'm a huge fan of both but morales did what barrera never could, at least at that weight.

 

I don't agree with the thread.

It's fitting that people can discuss Barrera without having to diminish Morales, but the same can't be said the other way round.

Speaks volumes.

 

he isnt. I think the trilogy proves that

 

Well, since no one else is playing ball yet...

He holds a win over Manny Pacquiao.

 

.................. He is a better boxer, tougher, more exciting & doesnt resort to dirty tactics even when someone is handing him his ass.

:good

 

Barrera is a better boxer, smarter, and holds two wins over Erik Morales. :good

I like them both though. I'm a grown up.

 

I was pissing about in the MMA forum there correcting some novices about that fine sport also.... Im back now.

 

............... Got the better of their trilogy on my card & had a better career outside of their 3 fights.

 

Your card has no credibility because you hate Barrera, by your own admission.

History will record Barrera as the best fighter, and rightly so. :good

 

............. Was an ATG at 122 lbs where as Marco was an ATG at :huh

 

.... he has the better resume and will rank higher in ATG status overall.

-not even selfkill can say **** about that.

 

i knew we were gonna disagree on this at some point...I give Barrera 2 of the 3 (obviously not the 2 that the judges gave him)

 

Ironic that most people who saw Mab fight Morales at 122lb, felt the decision went to the wrong man.

 

................... Was never handed his ass in his prime.

:thumbsup