ending the margarito/mosley cheat s** right now

of course..but you guys said loaded gloves killed people before, not true bro....

and plus, that fool took padding out of his glove, and had his wraps tampered with....

 

Margarito did not remove the padding from his gloves. It's entirely different.

 

Wow you are ****in solid. You aint got a clue. ****in idiot

 

A few points;

1) the substance in the wrap does not matter. What matters is its effect. Since the subsance makes the hands harder it can be considered a weapon. TOny's trainer agreed that the substance hardened the gloves. He also gave a lame excuse about other fighters inthe Gym using his bag and that he just used some old guaze(yeah, right on both hands). He did this to attempt dispell any attempt at claiming intent. This is important because in order to claim attempted assault and battery with a leathal weapon you have to prove intent. So what do we have, we have a corner that agrees that the substance is dangerous in the gloves but trying to avoid criminal charges.

2) You say that no one disagrees with the fact that Tony's actions were more dangerous than SSM. If that is the case we all agree that the puishment for tony should be more harsh. you say that the two things are equally illegal. If all transgration were equal then all punishments should be equal. Therefore, if you jaywalk you should get the death sentance right? If you cannot agree with the previous statement then you have to agree that different crimes must and should be treated differently under the law. Also the punishment should fit the crime.

3) Therefore, if you agree that both; a) Tony's actions with harden gloves were more dangerous than SSM. b) the punishment should fit the crime. c) Tony punishment should be more harsh than SSM

 

..