English Champions: Jack Broughton "The Father of Boxing"

Jack Broughton is considered champion from either his win over Tom Pipes in 1734, or his win over George Taylor in 1736, until his loss to Jack Slack in 1750.

He is known as the Father of Boxing with innovations such as the Broughton Rules, and reintroducing the boxing glove for sparring.

From Pugilistica
JACK BROUGHTON (CHAMPION)— 1734-1750.

BROUGTON is indisputably entitled to be regarded as the founder of the modem art of self-defence. The successor of Fig in popularity, he far exceeded that stalwart cudgeller in fistic science, and in the application of those principles which stripped the practice of boxing of many of those features of ruffianism and barbarity with which the unregulated contests of mere bruisers had invested it. There was a neatness and quickness in his style which far distanced his competitors, and drew crowds to witness his exhibitions. He appears first to have introduced stopping and barring blows, then hitting and getting away ; before him it appears to have been toe-to-toe work, or downright hammering; at any rate, his method appears to have had the novelty of a discovery with his spectators and his antagonists. He stopped the blows aimed at any part of him by his adversaries with so much skill, and hit his man away with so much ease, that he astonished and daunted his opponents, and those persons who had the temerity to enter the lists with Broughton, were soon convinced of his superior knowledge and athletic prowess : while most of his competitors, who were compelled to give in from their exhausted and beaten state, had the mortification to behold Broughton scarcely touched, displaying as much cheerfulness and indifference as if he had scarcely been engaged in a set-to.

He was indebted to nature for a good person ; his countenance was manly and open, possessing a sharp and penetrating eye, that almost looked through the object before him, which gave animation to his face. His form was athletic and commanding, and denoted uncommon strength. Every spectator felt impressed who beheld him. Six feet, wanting an inch, in height, and fourteen stone, or thereabouts, in weight.

Broughton became as a fixed star in the pugilistic hemisphere. His talents as a boxer gained him many admirers and patrons; but his good temper, generosity of disposition, and gentleness of manners, ensured him numerous friends. He was intelligent, communicative, and not desticute of wit. The system he laid down was plain, and easy to be understood ; and, under his instruction, several of his pupils arrived at pugilistic eminence, and gave distinguished proofs of the acquirements they had gained under so great a master.

Broughton was still, up to 1742, an exhibitor at the Great Booth of George Taylor ; we shall, therefore, before giving an account of his adven- tures ''on his own hook," turn to his exploits at the Tottenham Court Bead establishment.

Like all great masters, Broughton, we learn, always exhibited something new in his several contests ; and those pugilists who had seen him fight, and supposed they had observed his method, were awfully deceived when they entered the lists with him, and expected to '' nail" him on " the old suit."

Contrary to most other boxers, he did not depend upon any particular blow, although he was distinguished for giving some remarkable hits, which were not easily forgotten. Broughton, when necessary in the conflict, by putting in ''Am stomach blow,'' often decided the battle; and his lunge under the ear generally produced terrible consequences to his opponent. The eye of Broughton was lively, piercing, and acute, soon perceiving the weak- ness of any adversary ; his arm, keeping pace with that valuable assistant, protected him from the most destructive blows ; and his quick penetration made him always aware of any direct intent pursued by his adversary, so as immediately to render it unavailing. His guard was so complete, that his frame appeared secured as if in a fence, uncommon strength and bottom often fell before him, and his expertness in the cross-buttock was great His various attitudes in the fight were fine and impressive, and his counten- ance always animated and cheerful.

Pipes and Gretting, already named, both distinguished pugilists — the former of whom hardily maintained the title of a " Champion" for a number of years — appeared nothing in the hands of Broughton, who gave them several chances to recover their lost laurels; these each proved beatings to them, and tended to increase his growing fame.

George Taylor, of whom honourable mention has been made, fell as a conquest to Broughton.

" George Stevenson, the coachman," says our perpetual resource. Captain Godfrey, whose thin quarto we must almost plead guilty to reprinting piece* meal, "stood up for the length of forty minutes in a most heroic style to Broughton. It was a hasty match, and although Broughton was extremely unwell, sooner than make any excuse, he agreed to fight Stevenson without having that regard for his preparation which he afterwards found be ought to have had But here his true bottom was proved, and his conduct shone and admired. The battle was fought in one of the fair booths at Tottenham Court Bead, railed at the end towards the pit. After a most desperate con- flict of thirty-five minutes, being both against the rails, and the coachman endeavouring to get the whip-hand of Broughton, the latter, by his superior genius, got such a lock upon Stevenson as no mathematician could have devised a better. There he held him by this artificial lock, depriving him of all power of rising or falling, till resting his head for about three or four minutes upon his back, he found himself recovering, then loosed his hold. By this manoeuvre Broughton became as a new man, and, on setting-to again, he gave the coachman a tremendous blow, as hard as any he had given him in the whole battle, so that he could no longer stand, and his brave contending heart, though with reluctance, was forced to yield. Stevenson was a beautiful hitter ; he put in his blows faster than Broughton, but then one of the latter's told for three of the former's. Stevenson had a most daring spirit, but his strength could not keep pace with it."

Broughton expressed a very high opinion of Stevenson as a pugilist.

Jack James, a dashing boxer, who ranked high in the annals of pugilism as a thorough-bred man, was compelled to acknowledge that he had found his master in Broughton. James's wrist, which in other contests had been considered so remarkably ''handsome," lost its attraction when in contact with the athletic arm of Broughton

We need not proceed further with an enumeration of his earlier contests, but come at once to his appearance at his own theatre, in the character of Champion of England.

We have noticed his differences with George Taylor. Broughton was promised liberal support and patronage if he would open a theatre for the better accommodation of the admirers of boxing.

Under the patronage we have already spoken of, Broughton seceded fromm the Tottenham Court Road establishment, rapidly completing a new building adjoining the Oxford Road, near the spot where Hanway Street, Oxford Street, now stands, and opened it on March 10th, 1743, with the subjoined advertisement in the Daily Advertiser. From prints yet existing in the British Museum, it appears that this edifice was somewhat similar to Astley's original circus and riding-school, in the Westminster Road, or rather the large temporary and removable theatres, which have of late travelled with equestrian exhibitions round our principal provincial towns. There were boxes, pit, and a gallery; a stage for the combatants in the centro of the ring, and the tout ensemble bore some resemblance to the pictures of tbe Old Fives Court, in Windmill Street. he following is a copy of the announce- ment : —

 

The appearance of this rival was a cruel blow to George Taylor, who saw the ruinous results which must ensue to his ''booth" from Broughton's popularity : he, therefore, as a counter-hit| instantly let fly in the following terms:—

To the Patrons and Encouragers of the Manly Art of Boxing.

Whereas, Mr. Bronghton, well knowing that I was to fight Mr. Field on Tuesday next, the 13th m March, 1743, in order to injure me, has maliciously advertised to open his Amphi- theatre on that day, and where several battles are then to be fought. To prevent the public from being deceived, I feel it my duty to inform them, that the principal part of the persons mentioned were never made acquainted with such circumstances, and have no intention of so doing. Mr. Broughton wishes to make it appear that he never imposed upon any of the pugilists who had been concerned with him in any transaction whatever ; but his imposition shall soon be made manifest to the world. And to show Mr. Broughton that I have no animosity against him as a pugilist, or any jealousy concerning his amphitheatre, I am willing to fight him, as soon as he may think proper, wherever it may please him, not regarding, as he loudly sets forth, the strength of his arm. George Taylor.

We are inclined to suspect that there was a little “ gag'' in the names of the pugilists set forth by Broughton, from subsequent occurrences ; be that as it may, Taylor had already fallen beneath his conquering fist, and his challenge was viewed as nothing more than mere bounce to detract from the triumph of the rival manager.

The charges of Taylor, made from time to time, led to a sort of paper war. Taylor charged Broughton with appropriating to himself the “ Lion's Share" of the door-money, to the injury of the other pugilists. This accusation Broughton replied to by showing to the satisfaction of his patrons that he had not received one hundred pounds ; that his amphitheatre had cost him upwards of £400 ; that he had appropriated but a third part of the door- money for his own individual emolument, and that the rest had been shared among the pugilists. This account proving satisfactory, firmly established Broughton and Tavlor perceiving that it would be useless to oppose so

powerful an opponent, relinquished his booth, and was engaged at the Amphitheatre, where the most noted of his “ merry men'* followed him, under an engagement to fight on no stage but his.

We now come to one of the most important epochs in the history of boxing, namely the promulgation of a “code” for the guidance of the combatants, and the satisfaction of the judges. These rules were " produced by Mr. Broughton, for the better regulation of the Amphitheatre, and approved of by the gentlemen, and agreed to by the pugilists, August 18th, 1743.'' The code promulgated by this Fistic Napoleon, whose law-making and fall were much like those of his great successor, had a much longer duration than the ''Code Napoleon!" for they lasted in perfect integrity from the period of their date until 1838, when, after the fight between Owen Swift and Brighton Bill, the "New Rules of the Ring" superseded Broughton's. We here give the original —

BROUGHTON'S RULES.

1. That a square of a yard be chalked in the middle of the stage ; and every fresh set-to after a fall, or being parted from the rails, each second is to bring his man to the side of the square, and place him opposite to the other ; and till they are fairly set-to at the lines, it shall not be lawful for the one to strike the other.
2. That, in order to prevent any disputes as to the time a man lies after a fall, if the second does not bring his man to the side of the square, within the space of half a minute, he shall be deemed a beaten man.
   
3. That, in every main battle, no person whatever shall be upon the stage, except the principals and their seconds ; the same rule to be observed in bye-battles, except that in the latter, Mr. Broughton is allowed to be upon the stage to keep decorum, and to assist gentle- men in getting to their places ; provided always, he does not interfere in the battle ; and whoever presumes to infringe these rules, to be turned immediately out of the house. Everybody is to quit the stage as soon as the champions are stripped, before they set-to.
   
4. That no champion be deemed beaten, unless he fails coming up to the line in the limited time ; or that his own second declares him beaten. No second is to be allowed to ask his man's adversary any questions or advise him to give out.
   
5. That, in bye-battles, the winning man to have two-thirds of the money given, which shall be publicly divided upon the stage, notwithstanding any private agreement to the contrary.
   
6. That to prevent disputes, in every main battle, the principals shall, on the coming on the stage, choose from among the gentlemen present two umpires, who shall absolutely decide ail disputes that may arise about the battle ; and if the two umpires cannot agree, the said umpires to choose a third, who is to determine it.
7. That no person is to hit his adversary when he is down, or seize him by the ham, the breeches, or any part below the waist: a man on his knees to be reckoned down.

These rules may be called the groundwork of fair play and manly boxing, and no man, from his experience, was better able to frame such a code than Broughton. “ It is to be observed," says the talented author of ‘ Fistiana' (Y. G. Dowling, Esq.), “ that to them we greatly owe that spirit of fair play which offers so wide a contrast to the practices of barbarous ages, when every advantage was admissible when brute strength or accidental casualties placed a combatant in the power of his antagonist. It is to be lamented that even in modem times, the inhuman practices of uncivilised periods have subsisted to a disgraceful extent, and hence we have beard of gouging, that Is to say, forcing out the eye of an antagonist with the thumbs or fingers — spurring, kicking a man with nailed shoes as he lies on the ground, striking him in vital parts below the waistband, seizing him when on his knees, and administering punishment till life be extinct, and a variety of other savage expedients by which revenge or passion has been gratified ; and it is remark- able that in those counties in which pugilism or prize fights have been least encouraged, these horrors have been most frequent. We refer to Lancashire in particular, where, even to this day, that species of contest called up-and- down fighting — that is, when a man is got down he is kept down and punished till incapable of motion — is permitted with impunity, unless indeed the death of the victim leads to the apprehension and trial of the survivor."

The adoption of Broughton's rules in the metropolis soon led to their extensive dissemination in the provinces, and public boxing was thereby stripped of half its evils ; while in the adjustment of private quarrels, the settlement of the simple issue of '' which was the better man" after '< a fair stand up fight," put an end to all bad feeling, and the conqueror or the conquered submitted with a good grace to '< the fate of war ;" the strongest proof of the effects of cultivation, and the best test of a manly and honourable feeling.

 

" To Broughton, then," continues Mr. Dowling, '' is to be ascribed the credit of two great reforms in the practice of pugilism, namely, the introduc- tion of science and humanity ; and by the moral clients these inculcated, more has been done to establish the high character of Englishmen for honour and fair play, than by all the eloquence of the pulpit or the senate." To Broughton also do we owe the introduction of gloves, or mufflers, for con- ducting mock combats or sparring matches, as they are now called, by which men receive lessons without injury, or display the art of self-defence without those painful consequences to which Captain Qodfrey so willingly submitted, and which he so feelingly describes, but which deterred young aspirants from entering those arenas in which, after harmless initiation, they often became distinguished adepts, or were prepared to take their own parts in unavoidable encounters. Broughton thus announces his new invention in the Daily Advertiser of February, 1747 :—

“ Mr. Broughton proposes, with proper assistance, to open an academy at his house in the Haymarket, for the instruction of those who are willing to be initiated in the master of boxing, where the whole theory and practice of that truly British art, with all the various stops, blow8, cross-buttocks, etc., incident to combatants, will be fully taught and explained ; and that persons of quality and distinction may not be debarred from entering into a course of those lectures, there will be given with the utmost tenderness and regard to the delicacy of the flraile .Cifii]i^ k-fiiuriiTation of the pupil; for which reason mufflers are provided, that will effectually secure them from the inconveniency of black eyes, broken jaws, and bloody noses.”

We have said that Broughton's original calling was that of a waterman ; it appears that the interest of his royal patron made him one of the Yeomen of the Guard to the King. He also accompanied the Duke of Cumberland on a tour to the Continent, of which an anecdote is preserved, of which we may say, si non e vero e ben trovato. “At Berlin he saw the fine regiment of Grenadiers raised by Frederick the Great. The champion was asked by his patron what he thought of any of them for a set-to when Bronghton, with a smile, instantly replied, 2Why, your royal Highness, I should haye no objection to fight the whole regiment, only be kind enough to allow me a breakfast between each battle.' " Thomas Carlyle has omitted this.

Thus far, Broughton appears to have sailed on the wave of triumph. His patrons were numerous and aristocratic; but the confidence which good fortune begets was to prove to him a snare, as it has to many before and since. Slack, a butcher, and a pugilist of some note, but who had already suc- cumbed to George Taylor, had, it appears, a quarrel with Broughton on a race-course, which led to a threat on the part of the champion that he would horsewhip Slack. The result was a challenge: Slack obtained friends, a match was made for £200 a-side, and as the door money was included in the sum contended for, it was estimated at £600 dear. Although properly falling under the biography of Slack, we here give the battle, for the purpose of rendering as complete as possible the history of the Father of Scientific Pugilism.

Broughton's overweening confidence proved his ruin; for, as we learn from a contemporary authority, '' he refused to take training preparation," although " he had not fought for a long time." Let others take warning by his fall.

On the evening previous to the battle (Tuesday, April 10, 1750) Broughton, who had invited his patrons and numerous friends to witness the battle, was rather apprehensive that Slack would not fight, and for fear any disappoint- ment should take place, made the latter a present of ten guineas not to break his engagement.

For the first five minutes, Broughton's superiority over Slack was so evident, that the odds were ten to one in his favour ; when Slack, recover- ing a little from the effects of his antagonist's blows, made a sudden and unexpected jump, planting a desperate hit between the champion's eyes, which immediately dosed them up. Broughton now appeared stupefied; and as it was two or three minutes before the effects of this fatal blow were manifest, the spectators were at a loss to account for the unusual movements of Broughton, who appeared to feel for, instead of boldly facing and attacking his man. At length his patron, the Duke of Cumberland exclaimed, "What are you about, Broughton ? — you can't fight I— you're beat!" To which Broughton instantly replied, “ I can't see my man, your highness-“ I'm blind, but not beat : only let me see my man, and he shall not gain the day yet" Broughton's situation was truly distressing; and Slack, following up this singular advantage, obtained a victory in fourteen minutes !

The Duke appears to have been most unworthily angered at his loss, which has been (we suspect extravagantly) stated to have amounted to £10,000. He always declared he had been " sold." There seems no cause for such an assertion.

 

This defeat proved Broughton's ruin. The Duke of Cumberland could never speak of this contest with any degree of temper, and turned his back on the beaten man. The legislature interfered, the amphitheatre was closed, and Broughton never fought more. Previous to this battle, it is said he had grown plethoric ,- if so, it requires no great acumen to opine the cause of the sudden swelling which temporarily blinded him.

The best monument to the memory of Broughton is the character and description of his pupil and admirer, the gallant Captain, which eulogy, like that of Lord Byron on the '' eminent" Mr. John Jackson, remain perma- nent answers to the slanderers of pugilists and pugilism.

“ADVANCE, brave BROUGHTON! Thee I pronounce Captain of the Boxers. As far as I can look back, I think, I ought to open the Characters with him : I know none so fit, so able to lead up the Van. This is giving him the living Preference to the rest; but, I hope, I have not given any Cause to say, that there has appeared, in any of my Characters, a partial Tineture. I have through out consulted nothing, but my unbiass'd Mind, and my Heart has known no Call but Merit. Wherever I have praised, I have no Desire of pleasing ; where-ever decry'd, no Fear of offending. BROUGHTON, by his manly Merit, has bid the highest, therefore has my Heart. I really think all will poll with me, who poll with the same Principle. Sure there is some standing Reason for this Preference. What can be stronger than to say, that for seventeen or eighteen Years, he has fought every able Boxer that appeared against him, and has never yet been beat? This being the Case, we may venture to conclude from it. But not to build alone on this, let us examine farther into his Merits. What is it that he wants ? Has he not all that others want, and all the best can have ? Strength equal to what is human, Skill and Judgement equal to what can be acquired, undebauched Wind, and a bottom Spirit, never to pronounce the Word ENOUGH. He fights the Stick as well as most Men, and under-stands a good deal of the Small-Sword. This Practice has given him the Distinction of Time and Measure beyond the rest. He stops as regularly as the Swords-Man, and carries his Blows truely in the Line ; he steps not back, distrusting of him- self to stop a Blow, and piddle in the Return, with an Arm unaided by his Body, producing but a kind of flyflap Blows; fuch as the Paftry-Cooks use to beat those Insects from their Tarts and Cheesecakes. No— BROUGHTON steps bold and firmly in, bids a Welcome to the coming Blow ; receives it with his guardian Arm; then with a general Summons of his swelling Muscles, and his firm Body, seconding his Arm, and supplying it with all it's Weight, pours the Pile-driving Force upon his Man. That I may not be thought particular in dwelling too long upon BROUGHTON, I leave him with this Assertion, that as he, I believe, will scarce trust a Battle to a warning Age, I never shall think he is to be beaten, till I see him beat.” Broughton retired into private life. In his later days he resided in Walcot Place, Lambeth. He was for many years seen as a constant frequenter of sales of private property, where he purchased out-of-the-way things, curio- sities, and articles of vertiu, and adhered to the costume of the period of the Second George. Of these habits the author of " Recollections of an Octo- genarian," gives us the following information : — ''He appeared to me," says the writer, “ a heavy, thick, round-made, large-boned man, about the height of Humphries, † To be sure when I saw him last he was in the vale of years, and had acquired some corpulency. It might be about the year 1785, when attending a lady, to look at some household goods, which were to be sold by auction in Walcot Place, Lambeth, a catalogue could not be procured, and seeing Broughton with one in his hand, I civilly requested the favour of him to permit the lady to look at a certain article in it. The old man replied with a sullen asperity of countenance, ' I want it myself,' turning his back upon me. At the instant, up started a little, pert, natty, humorous Jew broker, who, with real politeness, made the lady an offer of his cata- logue, and casting an arch look at the testy old champion, who was still close to us, ' Ah !' said he, ' Master Broughton, then you are a bear to-day,' alluding to the bulls and bears of Change Alley, where Broughton was well known to be daily jobbing with his property."

The “ Octogenarian" confirms the statement given below from the Annual Register : — ''He (Broughton') had long before left the ring, and lived inde- pendently on the property he had saved, and on an annuity which he enjoyed from his Royal Master, the old, or Culloden, Duke of Cumberland, whom, by the bye, he used in former days to style ‘ Duke William. ‘ '' Boxiana says he died January the 8th, 1789, but this can hardly be the correct date. In the Annual Register for 1789, Chronicle for January, we read as follows : — " Died, at his house, at Walcot Place, Lambeth, in his 85th year, the celebrated John Broughton, whose skill in boxing is well known, and will ever be recorded in the annals of that science. He was originally bred a waterman. His patron, the late Duke of Cumberland, got him appointed one of the yeomen of the guard, which place he enjoyed till his death. He was buried in Lambeth Church on the 21st instant, and his funeral procession was adorned with the presence of the several capital professors of boxing. He is supposed to have died worth £7,000."

His enjoyment of his place and pension till death seems to qualify the ''utter desertion" of his patron, and falsify the ''ruin" which is related is Boxiana apparently to " adorn a tale," if not " to point a moral."

† Richard Humphries, " the gentleman boxer," who beat Mendoza in 1788, is here alluded to. He was five feet nine inches. We suspect Broughton was an inch or two taller (Slack was five feet eight and a half inches) ; but his bulk, in old age, took off his height.

Heavyweight Champions from Ancient to Present

 

Thanks. Do you think it could have been someone else that died that inspired the rules? It's interesting that Pipes died a couple months after the first fight, having seconded Broughton. Any info on his death?

Of course it could all be a myth.

 

Is this legit?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Broughton_Rules.jpg

https://www.boxartboxingmemorabilia.com/store/p56/1743_Broughton's_Rules_of_the_Ring_broadside.html

Interestingly, it says at the bottom "As agreed by several gentlemen at Broughton's Amphitheatre, Tottenham Court Road, August 16 1743"

 

The Gregorian callender was only officially adopted in the UK by an act in 1750, I think it would have been Tuesday if that date was using the Julian calendar, if I'm not confused.