Enough of Improved Peter theory

Like Rocky Marciano, Sam Peter lacks the coordination to every become a good boxer. Unlike Rocky Marciano he lacks the motivation to get in shape. If you want to know what boxing shape looks like watch Marciano's first fight against Ezzard Charles. He was swinging like a neanderthal all 15 rounds. Peter only swings like a neanderthal for about 5 rounds at the most.

 

you think casamayor is a ***?

of course wlad lost to brewster fair and square, just as he also lost to purrity and sander fair and square

 

Then you have more sense than your friends that come on here and try to denounce Brewsters victory, I still believe 2 of the 3 knockdowns in the Peter/Wlad fight should of counted.

 

all three counted, it's at the ref's discretion how he wants to handle rabbit punching. peter cheated and the ref allowed him to get away with it, and he still lost, badly

 

Scam Cheater lost. Period. Furthermore he cheated and got dominated in the process. Try to change history, but you can't.

 

He lost by 3 points thats hardly losing badly, the ref also missed Wlad leaning and clinching Peter to death as well, as I said before you can see it both ways. It still doesnt take away from the fact Peter put Wlad on his ass and Wlad wasnt able to when he had him hurt, but in the end Wlad won a tough fight and I guess thats all that matters.

 

3 points is losing badly when you scored a knockdown. Real bad. That is a complete schooling.

 

there are a lot of fighters that put wlad on his ass, and 3 of them were able to finish the job

 

I agree Wlad has improved his clinching ability to better cope when hes hurt, I still think if Peter would of caught Wlad with cleaner punches and he didnt smother his punches when he had him hurt, I feel he would of finished him.

 

i think there was one time when wlad looked pretty hurt, but the round ended, that's boxing though.

 

Theres was 2 times I thought Wlad was hurt, but the one your reffering to was the worst time Wlad was hurt during the fight. I think Peter made some mistakes that I hope he could improve on or change, and I do believe Wlad will lose by knockout of course.

 

Samuel Peter will be the man to stop Wlad Klitschko and will claim his belts in doing so. I can't wait for this to go down in early 2008. Then Wlad can join his brother in retirement.

:hi:

 

I agree, one could only hope this match will be made in 08.

 

i can't wait for the rematch.

wlad by late KO



always like to see the deluded ones get a regular reality check. makes them all embarrased and humiliated. normally i'd never enjoy seeing that, but when they sing from the mountain top and wail and whine like an old hag it's delicious :yep

happened recently with pavlik/taylor, rahman/maskaev, briggs/ibragimov...

ahhh it will be sweet. and of course so will reading about how crap sam peters was really all along :rofl

there's be some creative revisionist history goin' down that's for sure!

 

Im new here so maybe it's not my place just yet to jump into the discussion, but....are you kidding me?

Why is it a big deal to you that Wlad did the smart thing and nullified that left hook of Peter's by clinching him?

Even during the fight, George Foreman himself said, and I quote, "when you've got a man that can punch like Peter can, you do you whatever you have to do to take that away from him, which is exactly what Wladimir is doing"

You trying to tell us you know more about boxing and what's smart and what isnt than George Foreman? I suggest you think about your answer.

The fact of the matter is, my trolling little friend, Peter had to resort to amateurish, crybaby tactics like rabbit punching and wrestling.

The commentators, all of them, also commented about how at least two of the kd's that the ref called on Wlad should not have been, as they were resultant of being pushed or wrestled and not being punhed.

But you know more than they do, don't you?