Enough with this Slow-Motion Crap.

When judging a fight no matter what your critera is for scoring a round you should try to put yourself in a suittion that is as close to what a official boxing judge expreances. Watching a fight in slow-motion is not an opition for a judge and it should not be one for you the same thing goes for Compubox and Punchstat.

 

In Soviet russia . . . . JMM still wins the ****ing fight

Get over it, Marquez landed the better punches

 

****ing Stevie Wonder scored that fight 8-4 for Marquez!

 

We shouldn't take advantage of slow motion because judges don't have it? That's the most idiotic thing I've heard today. Understanding that the judges didn't have that benefit is one thing, but that's no reason to stop ourselves.

 

Is this because slow motion tell different story?

I bet it does :deal

 

This content is protected

 

The reason we have these "robberies" is because of the dispute of judging accuracy. The better the judge, the better his eyes are at catching things and being able to compare real-time and slow motion allows people to bring a fair judgement comparable to a judge with the perfect eyes.

 

Ofcourse it's not but it proofs what really happen or who really won. For years I always thought Torrecampo land a whooping nuts shot on PAC to get the KO. Not until recently that I saw a slowMo clip where the shot landed on PAC chin and bounced down to his chest...legit KO. But in your case why are people complaining if the judges scored for PAC if they were there and not watching slowMo .

 

Watching slow mo makes the *****s, pisstards and haters goes blind. :deal

 

Not all judges have the same mentality, some score more for boxer, some score more for aggressor. In PAC case they scored for the aggressor.

 

Marquez: I'm not going to run like coward Mosley and I'm coming to KO PAC.

Watching it in slowMo: All I see is the ring rope coming out of Marquez face and exiting in Pacquiao face .

 

Pisstards et all : "Foot clash is common in southpaw vs orthodox, do you box?"

*******s : "Then show me more evidence of this common ocurrence"

Pisstards et all : Goes all quite and avoid the thread

:rofl

 

slow mo is cool when trying to pick the fight apart and understand every little thing in depth for an analysis

but like the op said the judges dont have that luxury they also dont zoom in or have fancy camera angles

if ya wanna grade judges for their cards you gotta judge to their limitations of judging

but if you wanna analyze it than slow mo is ok

 

Judges should watch fights behind a sound proof booth with replays, different angles and slo mo available to them.