argument there was no argument, this fight is a no contest between rigo and morales, tell me why throughout history are all the dominant champs alil, holmes mayweather etc all the most talented boxers, rigo has more talent than all of em more ability! YDKSAB :hi:ask a poster to see who won WTF u picked morales to win so how cud u win, rigo beats him 10 out of 10 times YDKSAB
It's not an opinion as far as technically yes he is and has ability, troll cant take it atschatschwhen you have that much ability how can morales win he cant! nor can any fighter beat him in the low eights past or present until he goes over his prime! YDKSAB!! we know rigo is heavily avoided it doesn't matter who he fights he wins, hes fought only donaire u say u really are a troll, :-(
What is this one win thing about, doesn't matter if rigo has 10 more fights he'll be the same guy, you put a 20 year rigo in the ring with donaire and he would have won, its the boxing techniques he uses which matter, knowing what to do in every situation in the ring, he beats all of em no problem! I'll pray for your health u really are one of the most boring trolling out there, Cordoba was his first 12 rounder and apparently paced himself I thought he won by more than 5 rounds there! but again ur the troll who said oh look at the cordoba fight how can he beat donaire lol YDKSAB what about morales getting schooled by Raheem Diaz and Barrera, YDKSAB!
I know of the 'Cuban School'. You need to know what you're talking about. Sanchez and Gomez as any very knowledgeable poster would tell you is up there in terms of H2H ability with the very best Cuba has ever produced. It's pretty damn implausible to suggest Salvador Sanchez, one of the very greatest finishers of all time, one of the very best H2H, the guy who can take flush bombs from Danny Lopez and Wilfredo Gomez, two of some of the greatest punchers of all time, would get stopped by Rigondeaux. You are very ratty on this forum, you don't have a thick skin, people can get under your skin and make a complete joke out of you very easily, you get into wars very easily and have no emotional self control. You must be a scatty mess in real life unless you're deliberately trolling..Stop reducing yourself into this childs game of needing to win a pathetic forum argument. I'm guessing you're a grown man, sort your shiit out.
Not at all, I try not to post here tbh, I know alot about the sport, and that's why I can't stand ignorance when someone is blatantly wrong I have to correct them, so many ignorant trolls on here, that could learn a thing or to from me, that's what angers me! even you could learn alot theres a good channel on youtube called rawboxintv I suggest you watch it! so you fans can think things through
I, too, believe that Rigo is something special... But not necessarily more special than Morales was. Rigo would successfully counter Morales for about as long as Morales took to figure out exactly what he was doing. Then, about round 2 middle, Morales would counter his counters with much harder, straight shots. Rigo would be hurt by the third, and hesitant to keep countering. If drawn into a fight, even worse for him. Morales would dismember him by about the 7th.
YDKSAB ur still replying complete waste of time, I can tell you''ve never boxed before with your terrible opinion, u dont understand what boxing is, when ur skillset is as complete as rigo, and morales very limited in comparision theres only one outcome which is morales getting outboxed, look at mayweather who is technically not as good as rigo the same style and it's effective against everyone! I've schooled you enough, stop trolling on a forum and actually go learn the sport for yourself becasue you don't know boxing! :hi: THe poll really says everything, Rigo an overwhelming favourite, if you picked morales by ko YDKSAB, hasn't morales been stopped many times and knocked down, has rigo ever been stopped no! stupid trolls!
I've schooled you on everything on every topic, you can go back and take notes, I can tell you have never boxed before so ur opinion is rubbish, go to rawboxingtv on youtube and watch the latest vid, you need to learn more about boxing not ur limited view right now!! goodybye:hi:
The poll says it all really, rigo an overwhelming favourite, most fans arn't stupid, how could morales pacquiao, MAB etc beat rigo when they're technically inferior, remember you don't win with one punch and rigo won't let you hit him more than once, So it ends the only way it can with the better talent winning people don't think things through just follow hype or have never boxed!
It's a bit of an underestimating of Cuban boxing if you are really suggesting that Salvador Sanchez and Wilfredo Gomez are up there with the best Cuba has ever produced (I'm assuming that you are refereeing to overall and not just bantamweight and featherweight divisions). If we are talking about the time of Wilfredo Gomez, he was definitely the best bantamweight (super bw) at the time. The best Cubans around that division at the time were Horta and Angel Herrera, both very accomplished boxers and while I wouldn't say that they would have defeated Gomez if they were to fight, they certainly weren't fair away from that level. But as for saying that Gomez and Sanchez are up there with Teofilo Stevenson, Felix Savon or Mario Kindelan and guys like that, then that's a bit of an exaggeration of their abilities. I know that I'm probably missing a whole a lot of other Cuban boxers but I can't really think of much at the moment. As for Rigondeaux, he is right up there with the very best Cubans, and while I think that he'd probably not knock them out, I view him as a far better boxer than both Sanchez and Gomez and it's realistic to say that he'd likely comfortably outpoint them both. Some people here will might say that boxing somehow didn't progress as a sport, but they have their own reasons for saying things like that. It's common sense in the Olympic/Amateur boxing that boxing now is way advanced than it used to be many years ago. When you look at Rigondeaux' matches from the Olympics 2004, and for example Hernadenz' matches from the Olympic 1980, there's really no comparison in quality, and also when you look at Rigo's pro performances now and those of Sanchez' and Gomez' from 70s, the difference is really huge and therefore it's not reasonable to claim that they would have defeated Rigo.