Erik Morales vs Manny Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SHADOW BOX, Aug 27, 2008.


  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i think everybody would beat pacman "IF" people would think harder . ;)
     
  2. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    Morales being overrated a little in this thread... :D

    The pac that he fought is not as good as today's version. Erik fought not prime pac as well skill wise ... but despite being cut and that silly glove demands pac only lost by 2 points.

    Pac moved up to 126 to fight the bigger MAB (his first fight @ 126)
    Pac moved up to 130 to fight the bigger Morales (his first fight @ 130)


    Prime Morales 122
    Prime Pac 130-135


    So prime for prime, a prime 130-135 pac beats prime small 122 Morales any day of the week. :lol:

    and btw...

    "IF" pac wasn't cut that badly and didn't used pillow gloves he would have knocked Morales out!!! :yep
     
  3. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    And "IF" you weren't such a ******* you might realize the error of your ways:hey
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
  5. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    "IF" you don't like my post then just SHUT THE **** UP! :hey
     
  6. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    Don't be mad:lol:


    I love your posts, I'm always up for a good laugh!
     
  7. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007

    boxing 'purists' are inconsiderate sometimes:nut
     
  8. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007

    bigger "if"

    :hey :yep
     
  9. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    so true:good
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I saw all of these fights. They were mostly competitive 12 rounders that ended in a UD- not what I would call a 'war', like the Barrera fights were. The kind most great fighters have many of on their resumes, many more than you have listed anyway, before they are considered battle-worn and shot.

    We simply have a different definition of what a war is.
     
  11. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    79
    Sep 3, 2007
    Its the polished part that means Morales would win clear + Morales was very fast himself at 122.

    122 - Morales wins very clear
    126 - Morales wins clear enough
    130 - either man may win & likely Morales without wear & tear
    135 - Pac wins

    Ps. Dont forget Morales had hard fights before his losses to Pac.....
    McCullouch
    Barrera X3
    Pacman
    Hernandez
    Espadas
    Chavez

    Some were predicting that Morales needed a rest BEFORE the 1st Barrera fight in 2000 as he was so active & just came off a gruelling war vs McCullouch.

    The guy also had something like 180 amatuer fights & its common knowledge that his dad put him in deep from day 1 & fighting in Mexico is always tough anyway.

    People should think before they type **** on esb sometimes.

    :thumbsup
     
  12. TomaTos

    TomaTos Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    Tough call, but when was Pacman in is prime ? I honestly think that Pacquiao have not prime yet.
     
  13. Morrissey

    Morrissey Underrated Full Member

    6,322
    3
    Jun 24, 2006
    The thing people misses, or fail to see, when they consider the Morales victory as a basis for their easy pick against Pac in a prime for prime match-up, or like in this thread (EM facing Pac instead of MAB for a series of fights.):

    1) That was a Morales who was hell-bent on proving a point, much like Margarito against Cintron in the rematch. I always think it was stupid to face someone in the calibre of Morales who was coming off a decisive loss, especially against his most hated rival. It was a make or break career fight for him. I actually favoured Morales in that fight, as I remember it, because I knew he would bring everything for that fight. If Pac fought a Morales who was coming off a win against MAB, I say we would have seen a different Erik Morales.

    2) The glove issue. If Pac did not win via TKO/KO in their second rematch, I would have brushed this issue off, but he did, and proved that it was a vital element in his being more effective against Morales.

    3) Morales was not able to seriously hurt Pac, bloody one eye and all, in any of those rounds in their first fight. To think that was a Pac whose defensive stance on that particular night was the definition of porous! Which would bring us to the next one.

    4) If Morales was not able to stun or even wobble Pac, Pac was doing the exact opposite to Morales during the later rounds. In short, Pac’s power and speed still can dent Morales’ legendary chin, while Morales, though his power was enough to make Pac respect it, was nowhere near Pac’s level in terms of effect.

    All these arguments being factored, and all things being considered (i.e. Morales is the superior boxer, Pacquaio is the harder and faster puncher), I would say it is a 50-50 fight anytime of the week.

    But I am sure it would always be a FOTY contender fight.
     
  14. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Morales dismantled, embarrassed and outworked Pacquiao in their first bout.
    I would expect a master performance by a peak Morales, virtually a shut out.:smoke
     
  15. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    good post :good