Errol Spence exposed lol a 40 year old Pac would dominate him

Pac hasn't faced many fellow southpaws in his career. You could say Cotto and DLH were converted southpaws and Manny handled both of them with ease. But he also struggled against Agapito Sanchez.

IDK, at this stage of his career I think Pac would lose. He might do well for the first 4-5 rounds but than he would fade down the stretch.

 

Pac will dance around that slow, flat footed Spence that fought Porter, and Pac would probably get a flash KD or two.
But that's only for as long as Pac's stamina holds up.
Crazy though that a 40+ year old boxer is THIS relevant in the WW division.

 

you sure about that ?

 

First off, u clearly don't know the saying, style make fights. Ur comments is speaking like a casual fan. Porter has giving problems to all the top WW's he's fought. Brooks, Thurman, Garcia, Ugas and now Spence. Crawford would have the same problems. One thing we all can agree on is Porter always comes to fight. As far as Pac. U know Pac only fights people he think he can beat. It's a reason Pac has turned down Spence to fight. Even Porter style is all wrong for Pac at this point of his career. Spence beats Pac comfortably. Pac can't deal with those body punches for 12 rds and don't have the stamina to deal with Spence for 12 rds.

 

Limited doesn't mean much when your a bad style match up, which a pressure fighter who's tough as nails is for Spence.

So in 2009? When Pacquiao was at his peak as an ATG and Porter was only a year into his pro career? I'm not ****ing surprised.
That Pacquiao isn't here any more.

And? Thurman and Brook didn't.

Give Spence some credit, he's clearly a top 2 WW and has just beat a top 5 WW.

 

I will ask you again who has dominated Porter? Did Garcia? Did Brook? Did Thurman? I guess all of them are hypejobs to right? BTW Porter would beat the **** outta Pac, he couldn't even deal with Horn FFS.

 

Apparently there is no way to get praise on this board. Had Spence beaten porter easily, porter would have become a joke gate keeper and no one would give him credit. Instead, porter comes in looking like an elite ww, throws the kitchen sink at Spence and Spence grits his teeth and grinds out an impressive victory but he still can't get any credit. Can someone enlighten me on what kind of performance Spence could have given against porter that would garner him some praise around here?

 

There isn't one

 

At all. Most people on here are blindly partisan concerning who they like and feel deserve accolades and who they don't. There are precious few unbiased people on here that will give credit to someone they don't like. Had Spence stopped him, they would've said Porter was already finished and pointed to his performance vs. Ugas. They talk about Spence's low shots but are eerily quiet about Porter's (who landed quite a few as well). The low shots in this fight was parity, they both concentrated on the body and both went low a number of times, but you only here complaints about Spence.

Spence will not get credit on here.

 

If Pacquiao and his team think they can beat Spence let them make the match as it’s easy to make and most lucrative bout in the division and will do over a million pay per view buys. Spence’s poise accuracy, speed, skill mentality would be to much for Pacquiao at 40. It would be likely facing Marquez again but worse.

 

He's not going to give credit to Spence, cause he's a Spence hater.

 

That wasn't the same Thurman.