Errol Spence Jr - INSIDE THE RESUME

Spence has been the #1 WW for years in till Crawford steps up and gets some legitimate competition on his resume.

Pacquiao is old and smart enough to know to avoid Crawford/Spence.

 

I think that yes.
2 belts.
Crawford 1 belt.

 

Spence is definitely the #1 Welterweight. Crawford's welterweight resume, is that of a Euro Champ. All fluff.

 

Crawford is from U.S. He wasn't euro champ.

Terence is good boxer, he just should fight with Spence Jr.
This fight will be sold really well and become notable fight in their reusmes.

 

You miss the analogy man. Euro Champs like Felix Sturm, Sven Ottke etc. Forever fighting lackluster opposition and never stepping up to fight the best. Actually, their resumes, are better than Crawford's.

 

spot on.

 

Spence's resume is no better than Crawford's.

 

you mean they both are bums?

 

Lets be fair. Porter shouldn’t have been holding a belt. Spence can thank Thurman for that. Pacquiao should be the one holding two belts. Thurman did what Soence just done years ago and Pac beat him.

Can’t believe those two(Crawford & Spence) are expecting Pacquiao instead of fighting each other to earn it.

 

Better is to fight not top 2-3 ppl and sit on belt long years & collect paychecks.
Boxing is business and Terence and Spence does know business.

 

i disagree, Spences Welter weight resume is much better than Crawfords. Crawfords best resume at welter is Khan, Mean machine and a shot Brook. Spence fought a much much better Brook, Porter, Garcia and a still pretty good Algieri becoming the first man to stop. Something pacquiao nor Provodnikov were able to do.

 

It's significantly better than Crawford's. Crawford's welterweight resume consists of the guy that got a gift decision over Pacquiao, the guy that got a draw with bootleg Sugar, and three other guys who weren't even top 10 welters when Crawford fought them. Spence has Bundu, Peterson, Brook, Garcia, Porter and Garcia. Thats is a significantly better group of opponents.

 

What made Brook shot? Is it because he lost to Spence. He gave Spence a hell of a fight and the only thing that stopped it was the damage to his eye. He came in the fight with a repaired eye but had no problem with that eye. Spence damaged the other one. He came into the Crawford fight with repaired eyes and got stopped without damage to either eye. He won his next three fights after the Spence fight and then loss to Crawford. He wasn't no more shot than when he fought Spence. Porter is next on Crawford's list and watch what he does to Porter. Danny called out Spence, he didn't call out Crawford and there is a good reason for that. With the exception of Porter and Danny, their resumes are basically the same. You can take their resumes and put them side by side and you will find that they have fought the same types of fighters.

 

Brook is a journeyman?