Crawford is sharper. Spence has proven grit. Something to consider: Spence is a volume puncher. He plays chess, but he only wants to play speed chess. Historically, when an elite volume puncher faces an elite sharp shooter, the volume drops. The more time Spence spends thinking and not punching, Crawford is winning.
Crawford had a tough fight against a guy named Kavaliauskas.Spence is definиtеly much better than that guy and he will be better for his next after the returning.Crawford is overrated.Will be exposed against Spence.
guy that doesn't have his power and S/C level. Boxing skills? I do not think that he is much better than Machine. Experience? Spence does have more experience than Machine. To win fight? Yeah, Spence is stronger than Machine, more durable and more tough. Therefore Spence most likely might have lesser problems vs Machine than Crawford.
This is PR how Crawford wish ppl to see it. Instead of Spence his last fight was vs this Machine. Machine isn't well known or No1, No2, No3.
I just hope Spence and PBC have the balls to make this fight. "Let the fight marinate" and "he's on the other side of the street" smack of finding an excuse to NOT fight Crawford
Crawford will provide far more footwork than Porter or either Garcia have shown him. Crawford is also way more adaptable than Spence and he is much more able to likely to figure Spence out than visa versa. Spence has a preferred way he wants to operate while Crawford will fight as the fight demands