Errol Spence: Terrence Crawford Is NOT Getting 50/50!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tomato(e) Can, Apr 27, 2019.


  1. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    I don't even know how there is even any debate about this...

    Ellerbe has said that a fight with Crawford is not happening anytime soon.

    You've got Spence spewing garbage about Crawford being across the street and now he's talking A-side garbage.
     
  2. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    Diva.
     
  3. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,029
    Feb 19, 2007
    theres a debate because you keep stirring every pot with your nonsense. youre that broad at work who is always in everybodies business just stirring up conflict. thats your identity.
     
    IsaL likes this.
  4. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,121
    May 29, 2007
    So what! Floyd was pound for pound number when he fought De La Hoya and Arturo Gatti but they got the lions share of the purse as the money men. Floyd took a lesser share but after he beat them he became the money man.
     
  5. lewis gassed

    lewis gassed The Bronze Dosser Full Member

    25,429
    19,508
    Nov 24, 2013
    Let the promoters talk money, your job as a fighter is to say yes I wanna fight the best.

    Spence is starting to sound like Wilder.
     
    dougemerypm likes this.
  6. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,662
    Jul 26, 2004
    I actually dont think it should be 50/50.

    Spence has the better resume and has done the better numbers.

    That being said.

    I cant stand seeing clear rivals care so little about being number one that they are fine with letting a few percentages on a split get in the way of a fight happening.

    This is exactly the type of attitude that is infecting this sport and I thought Spence was more ballsy than this.

    Gonna let 5% or so get in the way of the biggest fight in the division happening. Hard not to see this as a duck if this really is what keeps the fight from happening.

    However.. its lame but possible that he's just saying this as a negotiations ploy and that they really would accept 50 50 if push came to shove. We'll see.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2019
    dougemerypm, IsaL and lewis gassed like this.
  7. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    Problem is that Crawford doesn't have anybody to face. After Spence dispatches of Porter, Garcia, Thurman etc. he will be viewed as the clear number one, as Crawford does nothing but continue to fight scrubs, and get older. Spence is clearly the A side at this point. Crawford can only blame himself. He'd have gotten more money with PBC per fight, although he probably would have been fighting twice a year, as opposed to three times a year.
     
    kirk likes this.
  8. Bigdog2002

    Bigdog2002 Active Member Full Member

    705
    501
    Oct 19, 2018
    Man they both get 50-50 because they both need each other to cement legacy and establish themselves as the new boxing star!

    Spence didn’t sell 300plus Ppv it was Mikey!
    Why is porter vs Spence not on ppv??? Because they know damn well Spence does not carry the star power yet!

    Crawford only did 150k !!

    Neither is the a side!!!
    Just fight and a new superstar is born!
     
    George Crowcroft and dougemerypm like this.
  9. FloatingGhost

    FloatingGhost Some guy Full Member

    2,051
    459
    May 16, 2012
    Seems pretty simple to me. Crawford clearly wants the fight. Spence is talking that old played ass “other side of the street” bull**** and whining about purse splits before there’s even talk of negotiation. Bad look for Spence.
     
    dougemerypm, kirk and Ph33rknot like this.
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,239
    23,913
    Jul 21, 2012
    50/50 is fair.

    If Spence shared the pot evenly with Garcia , why won't he for Crawford?

    Neglecting a fair 50/50 split is always sign of a duck.
     
    dougemerypm and kirk like this.
  11. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    I read 1.5 paragraphs and that was enough. Do you really think Mikey would have survived 12 rounds with Crawford? No! Crawford would have seriously hurt and put Mikey away. And he wouldn't need to throw 1,100 punches.
     
    dougemerypm and Bigdog2002 like this.
  12. Bigdog2002

    Bigdog2002 Active Member Full Member

    705
    501
    Oct 19, 2018
    Yes the Mikey that fought Spence would have been stopped by Crawford!
     
    dougemerypm and Tomato(e) Can like this.
  13. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    Outside of Joshua versus Wilder, Crawford versus Spence is the second most talked about fight and boxing topic. Spence made these comments yesterday.
     
  14. Pretty Boy Floyd

    Pretty Boy Floyd Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,214
    3,041
    Sep 10, 2016
    This is one of the rare occasions i do feel a fight is genuinely worth a 50/50 split.
     
  15. sid

    sid Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,756
    2,844
    Nov 2, 2013
    No one has Spence as the P4P #1 & nor should thay have Crawford as the P4P #1 then .
    Crawford needs to fight the likes of Spence to get in p4p top 10.
    All this bull**it not fighing each other next people will have Wilder in p4p list lol.