Errol Spence Trashes Terence Crawford's Resume; Says He's A-SIDE And NOT Fighting On ESPN (!)

He's correct although Crawford is a 3 weight world champion Spence has beaten the better fighters.

I'd argue that Van Heerden would be one of Crawford's best wins if it was he who had beaten him.

 

He's not lying. Crawford's resume isn't ****. Not saying that Spence's resume is deep at all, but he has 24 fights, and has fought better opposition than Crawford has in 33 fights. Bundu, Algieri, Peterson, and Brook, are a better quartet of boxers than Horn, Diaz, Postol, and Indongo.

 

Bundu and Algeri?!?!

 

Love how Spence is s***ing on Indongo when Lou DiBella Indongo's promoter is sitting right next to him LOL.

 

This.

 

Truth is these two ain’t gonna fight each other for years anyway so in the meantime they both need to eliminate the opposition like newly crowned Porter(shouldn’t be a problem)and the long standing albeit inactive champ in Thurman who I still think at his best can pose both Spence and Crawford problems,he’s that good imo

 

Spence talking bull****. Nothing he says holds together. Crawford beat Gamboa who is still miles ahead of Chris Algieri. Indongo lost to Prograis but still was unified champ, did Algieri ever accomplish that?

I'd actually pick Crawford over Spence.

 

What is silly, is claiming that it's debatable that Spence's resume is better. It really isn't debatable. It's quite clear that Spence's resume is better. Crawford unifying ain't **** more than an honorary title. People are acting like it automatically makes Crawford's resume good. It's not like he was beating Tszyu, Judah, and Whitaker to unify. He beat the stiff postman, and the Namibian flukey man.

 

Duck right there
Floyd mentality
didn't take long i see
expect ellerbre floating round real soon

 

I wonder if the ldbc will now make videos trashing Spence for ducking Crawford?

Of course not yet they will accuse every other fighter of ducking him and make hundereds of videos saying boycott certain fighters fights for not fighting Spence like the porter Garcia fight last night.

 

Typical lack of the facts. Crawford did not even have a promotor for the first 20 bouts he had. So to say it is his fault he did not face competition for 33 bouts is ignorant. Crawford had to fight as a sparing partner and get "discovered" by them before big name promotion would give him a shot. He then had to give away 10 lbs and step into the main event on HBO to get an opportunity. He won at 135 and at 140 and now at 147. He fought several undefeated boxers and champions, who immediately become "garbage" after he has made them look bad. Where was Mikey Garcia or Prograis when Crawford was at 140. Not that he is gone they flock there. THAT speaks for itself. Spence started with top flight promotion due to his Olympic exposure. Crawford did not get that opportunity so comparing the opponents over the length of their career is apples to oranges

 

This. Bundu was over 40 years old and took a complete beating from Thurman two years before. Any durability Bundu had was beaten out of him by Thurman. Algieri can't put a dent in a marshmallow.

The only good win Spence has is Kell Brook, who was damaged goods after the GGG fight.

Crawford doesn't have that good of a resume, but his wins over Gamboa and Postol trump anything he's done.

Thurman by far still has the best resume at 147.