Errol Spence Vs Lomachenko at 140

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Uppercut_Artist, Jan 23, 2017.


Page 3 of 3
  1. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,427
    14,649
    Feb 28, 2016
    That being said it's a pretty pointless matchup to be honest, I don't want to see a horrible version of Spence @ 140 against anybody.
     
    KiwiMan, Jan 24, 2017
    KiwiMan, Jan 24, 2017
    #31
    DoubleJab666, drenlou and rorschach51 like this.
  2. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    What is this circus act matchup? What's your agenda?
     
    Gannicus, Jan 24, 2017
    Gannicus, Jan 24, 2017
    #32
  3. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,843
    15,619
    Nov 9, 2015
    You talk about fighters putting on 10llbs or dropping them in the lower weight divisions like one might talk about a HW bulking up. We can't talk about llbs off or on when considering moving divisions, we need to consider % of overall weight dropped or gained, and when looking at it this way, your match-up makes little or no sense.... Loma, by default...
     
    DoubleJab666, Jan 24, 2017
    DoubleJab666, Jan 24, 2017
    #33
    drenlou likes this.
  4. Uppercut_Artist

    Uppercut_Artist Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,213
    860
    Sep 22, 2015
    Lomo depends on footwork but his footwork is nullified by Spence's superior positioning and cutting the ring off. That body attack would be brutal and intended to slow Lomo down for the middle rounds. Lomo won't like how Spence is treating him like a rack of ribs. Shades of a superior Salido!
    Running away, ain't gonna help you. Spence is a beast in aggression and the constant pressure wears a man down.
    Spence KO 7
     
    Uppercut_Artist, Jan 24, 2017
    Uppercut_Artist, Jan 24, 2017
    #34
Page 3 of 3