Errol Sprints

Pac's surgeon made a direct public statement confirming the surgery.

Lomachenko's surgeon made a direct public statement confirming the surgery.

Spence's surgeon did not. In fact, ESPN spoke to an opthalmologist, not Spence's, for their story on retinal tears regarding the Spence fight.

I wonder why Spence didn't authorize his surgeon to make a public statement like most professionals athletes do.

 

Why? Because not every one is you, who for some reason feels entitled to hear something directly from a Doctor. And no, most professional athletes do NOT have their doctors give a statement. Do you watch other sports??

 

If you choose to believe Spence without any proof, that's your choice. I doubt Spence's claim due to an absence of proof.

Why do you have a problem with this?

 

gtfo here with that childish attempt at logic...

"If I didn't see it, it never happened..."

 

Here's a simple fact — Spence never provided proof.

If no proof is enough proof for you, cool. I have no problem with your absence of logic.

 

everything is black and white with you.... Learn to see greys for ****'s sake.

 

All we know is that he saw an opthalmologist. That's clearly enough for you. It's a simple fact — Spence has not proven that he had a retina tear.

Live in the gray, guy. More power to you.

 

Said the guy who declinend a $1000 bet Clown.

I'm still offering it to you. Whoever finishes higher in Kirks Prediction league at the end of 2022 gets the money. If somebody finishes first we're doubling it up.

Spineless cowards like you will always refuse such bets .... so i'm not surprised.

 

I have never seen your brain. I have no proof it exists yet I know it's there. You have never seen oxygen, yet they tell you that is what you breathe and you believe them.

No proof is enough when all other factors fall within your personal scale of deductive reasoning.

The doctors at the Nevada State Athletic Commison discovered the tear, what reason would they have to lie?

Your personal scale aside just know that you can also pay a doctor to make false statements and if the money is right (Read, you hire them to be your personal doctor from now on) most of them will. These doctors make millions a year helping professional athletes. Floyd Mayweather had personal physicians swear about this and that who were once acredited and respected in their fields.

Spence has access to these types of medical mercenaries and could have easily paid one. He didn't, yet he was photographed at a hospital and wore all the post surgery gear for what... fun?

 

The NSAC are hardly saints. They're as corrupt and blind as it gets.

 

Ok so since Spence didn’t provide a statement or whatever you automatically assume it’s because he ducked Pac. Only an idiot would assume that. Why exactly would he finish most of the training camp, sign the Pac contract years ahead of time, and show up to all the conferences if he was ducking Pac. You know how easy it is to fighters these days. You really think he’s gonna pull out last minute against a shot fighter? You’re a moron

 

So is the prevailing theory that Spence paid them (Athletic Commision) to lie but wouldn't spend the money for his doctor to back them up? To duck a forty two year old Pacquiao? A fight Spence would have made tens of millions for?

Really?

It doesn't past the laugh test.

 

Spence pulled out because of a supposed eye injury. Did he provide proof? Yes or no?

 

I see you completely ignored oddones replies that completely make your comments look more bs then they already are

 

Answer the question. Has Errol Spence provided proof of the injury he claimed forced him to pull out of the Pac fight?