Then you need to be consistent..... what about these:- Haye Pascal Jermain Taylor Kermit Cintron You think they are ranked correctly with the emphasis on their resume at their ranked division?
****. Sturm has a better CV anyway- I'm just feeling vindictive towards him. Who's on the 160 list thus far?
Funnily enough I used Pacman as an example in that arguement as well. Let's leave it for the moment though, Ant, mate. Let's get the 160lbrs done!:good
There is emphasis on their resume at the division they are at, but their ranking is not solely based on their resume in the division.
Pavlik AA Sturm Gevor Sylvester Mundine Zbik Winky Geale Macklin/Barker/N'Dam N'Jikam/Pirog at No.10...not fussed. Hard division to do.
Who would have thought this time last year that people would be having heated debates over Khan's place in the top ten divisional rankings at 140? Crazy sport is boxing.
Well, although he's being fed by Arum, he has beaten JT when he was lineal champ. I'd say it was justified. What arguement?:yep:good
I'll agree then, Kos. **** Pavlik- he was a ***** the other day over the tourney. He's also been out for ages. Beating Lockett and Rubio aint amazing really. I concur.
Miguel Vazquez ranked at LW? The guy usually fights at LWW and WW. He weighed in at 136 against Prescott and Prescott was nothing great to start with. He also has losses to Bradley and Saul Alvarez.