ESB Essay Writing Competition: Comparing fighters from different eras

Ok...you need to use your logical mind to unpeel it, before answering...it is a philosophy question, really...

First of all, you have to decide whether you agree that comparisons between fighters from different eras are indeed unwarranted. Then you have to decide whether, even if they are unwarranted, it follows that such comparisons cannot reasonably be made. You should also explore whether the fact that they might be warranted might not in fact allow for reasonable comparison. There, that's all the angles. Boxing knowledge usefull but not necessary.

 

Reason I said 250 is because I value economy of language. I don't want a wolly, long-winded answer. 250 or thereabouts should be sufficient for a good answer.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/unwarranted

 

I like your justification!

 

"Comparisons between fighters from different eras are unwarranted, and, as such, cannot reasonably be made."

...my patience knows no bounds!

 

About what I am talking.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

"Comparisons between fighters from different eras are unwarranted, and, as such, cannot reasonably be made."

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

​

 

Don't get over yourself, mate...I let you have one or two over, as I was mean to you before.:smooch