He's in. Sean is not in. Polish Pummler is not in. Axe is not yet in. Odo. There are many options from which to choose.
China hand Joe and WhataRock. BTW Thanks to everyone that voted for me, and Yes I accept my nomination.
CHJ is very rational, he just bases his opinions on analyzing fight footage, not by popular opinion and resume. This is what makes his choices seem very odd to most posters. Amsterdam does the same thing to an extent. I try to do the same thing where possible also, although it requires viewing a lot of footage which can be very time consuming. However, I also like to take resume into account to a fair degree.
Hahaha. My thoughts exactly. Pacman will be the number one contender in every division and p4p no.1---
You are entilted to your opinion. I can see why you get annoyed, as a lot of people here just praise him because its the popular thing to do. A lot of times I can see what he is trying to do though, and can appreciate the train of thought he is using. Regardless, you got my vote in the first lot of nominations, and I figure the more popular guys will get through no problems. I want CHJ there because he adds diversity to the commitee. He is prepared to be unique at times even if it means getting criticized for it.
Congrats on making the cut. what i find funny is though i didnt get one mention or nominated by one person. I guess being the reigning Boxing Tipping Champ doesnt mean stuff all. Its not like i can Nominate myself for something like this. Having said that there are plenty of bigger names than myself that should be on this panel before say the expert tippster. But i would say this job would be perfect for say someone like myself that would class himself more an analyst that anything else.
Actually, next month, and anytime thereafter, the only way to get on the committee is to nominate yourself. So if you don't get on this time, you can basically put your name in the hat and see what comes of it:good
Nope, I believe we have 6 more days of voting left. I haven't been on much to day so I don't know the tally. But there are supposed to be 18 members from General and I think only 8 or so were taken after the first tally. So there are spots left. I was only saying that you CAN nominate yourself from here on out after this initial month. That in fact it was the only way to get on after the first month is on. There is a constitution, you should check it out. It's a little long, but well written.
Ive checked out what is for. i think and believe that voting for a system that may be flawed anyway. i mean really the only way for the ESB rankings to be fair is if you have members from selected areas. Like example. 10 - USA spots 5 - UK spots 3 - European Spots (Not UK) 3 - Aussie Spots 3 - Asian Spots 5 - Latin spots (Mex,PR,Bra etc) Thats the only way i see it to be fair and get fair voting.