ESB Official Top 15 P4P and SMW Rankings

Looks prety good to me


EDIT - Dont like Bradley at 9 and Khan nowhere in sight. Thats a little bet bull****

 

p4p move Nonito up to 3
Gamboa up to 8
Wonjongkam @9
Bradley down to 10

SMW
Bute is clearly #2 @ worst and the rest is fine

 

I have Bradley @ 10 if KKKKKHHHHAAAAANNNN!!!! would have bet Peterson he would be in that spot. Even if he did win on the cards he showed several flaws in that fight which could legitimately drop him out of the top 10-15.

 

Bute too high.

 

Hopkins a wee bit high there imo

 

Hes got flaws for sure. But Bradleys not any better. The Peterson fight could have went either way. And Bradley blatantly ducked him.

I guess we should have JMM as the number one though for daring to do what Mayweather didnt and not just fighting Manny, but kicking his ass :deal

 

1. the word "official" stands for what exactly?
2. algorithm for computing the rankings?!
3. in which way the computation is representative for esb?

AFAIK, these rankings are just plain worthless because mindboggingly subjective; even if to some extent they might reflect reality, right now they are the nothing but the expression of void vanity/influence of loud speaking.

 

Hopkins too high and Gamboa over Cotto

 

Cotto should be at 9 not Bradley!

 

I think vitali should realistically be ahead of bradley but there's still an argument for bradley being ahead of vitali, and I disagree with you, khan does not belong on that list...did you forget that he just lost to lamont peterson, being exposed as having no inside game in the process?

 

good list.

 

if you had bothered to read my next post you wouldnt have to ask such a petulant question, blenkinsop

 

I agree, gamboa over cotto but hopkins belongs at that spot. the dawson fight was an mma fiasco and before that he beat pascal twice, the first fight being a robbery even a blind man could see. he's legitimately an atg master technician in boxing's current landscape and he turns 47 in two weeks.:admin

 

wasn't remotely petulant, I may have badgered you in my delivery but petulant? come on. anyway, I was responding to what you said initially. in regards to your second post I think your point hinges on the bradley-peterson fight, and in that case it's a matter of opinion. I think bradley won, he fought through some serious rough spots but he won in my opinion. also, the fact that bradley ducked khan shouldnt gain khan entry. I think it could be used as evidence to admit khan into the p4p list IF he hadn't lost to peterson. feel me?