ESB Official Top 15 P4P and SMW Rankings

who should be ahead of him?

 

I know mate i was just messing with the petulant thing

I was talkin about Khan Peterson. Khan won in my eyes, but it could have went either way. Didnt see the Bradley Peterson fight but if it was a close one too, then it shows how close Tim and Amir are

If Tim had accepted the fight, then we would know for sure

Theyre both real close, which is really what i meant when its not fair to have one in and not the other

Khan has a ton of potential. Him and Ward are the two guys i see as the future p4p kings

 

good list. I would switch Martinez and JMM.

And Bradley and Cotto to switch

 

Yeah it's a good list. Despite Froch losing both to Ward and Kessler, he fought tougher opposition... so i think it's just right enough to keep him number 2, maybe number 3, because of the Kessler L. Dirrell has done nothing to earn his spot in top 4. Would love to see Dirrell vs Bute to fight over that 4 spot. Which Bute sits on right now... But great list ESB. Looking forward to another explosive year with the SMW

 

Peterson may have won 3 rounds at most vs Bradley, but Timmy outclassed him pretty much

 

I hope Pong punches Boxing Girl and Rummy square in the face for not being included in the top 10.

 

Bute at 4?? Hell no.. Easy 2.

 

that list is a little jacked bro, think a bit more on accomplisments and then come back and revise it. Your smartest move was having gamboa outside the top 10-but I would have him probably around 15 or 16 or so.

 

p4p ranks are ok, except the bitchbo bros are in it

but the sm rank suck

froch lost to kessler and direll and it above them and bute being undefeated is above the for the second time losing kessler.

This content is protected

2. bute
3. kessler
4. direll
5. froch

 

PERFECT. Dirrell bet Froch! Robbed! Kessler bet Froch too!

 

how can marquez be above mayweather when he was completely dominated by him?

 

I agree but I think the Peterson that fought KKKKHHHHAAANNN!!! was a better version. I do not rate based of record per-say, if Bradley beats Peterson and looks like a complete fighter I would rank him over Khan if Khan beat Peterson and he had holes in his game. I judge fighters on how they perform rather than record. So even if Khan would have won i saw to many things he did wrong and to many holes in his game that an elite fighter would take advantage of.

I am a fan of Khans ( and I could care less for bradley) and get so frustrated when he has a set back, but that is all it is. He has the potential to be a P4P fighter but he always stumbles when he is at the door.

 

Hopkins is WAAAAAAAAAAY to high, coming off a fight he quit in.

Klitchkos have no right being in the top ten.



Keith

 

:good good point and I agree. The fact that Khan lost to Peterson doesn't matter too much, but it's his overall performance.
Same way I view pacquiao. Even if you had jim beating Juan, the flaws you saw in him wouldn't make you rate him number 1

 

:deal