Interstingly, some have put JC at #3, I won't argue that considering the state of the P4P, but I was going to save his potential top 3 ranking after the Kessler fight. But here is a quick question - If Joe 'lacy's' Kessler, does that merit the #2 spot, given Kessler's class?:think Not talking about a competitive win, but a total wipe out/shut out like he put on Lacy.
I have already begun pondering such a jump. However, Pacman hasn't lost, and it's only in hindsight (except with his last fight) that I have begun to realize that Pacman hasn't fought a prime championship level fighter since 2004. His fans are starting to clamour about him being the "money man" in the lower weight classes and how others (champions mind you) will need to "get in line" to earn a shot at Pacman since he will take the big money fights. It's a shame really. Anyways, Pacman hasn't lost since the first Morales fight, so it would be hard to drop him. But Calzaghe will have faced 2 prime champions in a time frame where Pacman has faced none, and PBF has faced one (technically 2). It is an interesting dillema.
It's a really interesting dilemma. Lacy and Kessler don't have the legacy of a Marco A. Barrera, but we're not talking about a prime MAB by any stretch, even the one JMM beat, which had worse legs than the one Pac faced mind you... And then Morales coming off those losses... with no legs. Only can mean so much, you'd have to assume both are about on the level of a sub-top 5 guy, JMM himself may be, he's a favourite and I haven't forgotten how Terdsak and the other guy troubled him before MAB, two B- level fighters if that... It's really a weird situation. Calzaghe is facing his first true A level opponent coming up, if he totally and utterly wipes the floor with him, this would be the only scenerio I'd consider a #2 spot. Not any ****ing 115-113, 116-112 clear decision, but a 10 rounds or more in terms of rounds and a long stretch of just brutal domination, possibly a corner retirement, a scenerio like is possible given the styles, which Calzaghe definitley is at the stylistic advantage here and I also take the into consideration. Pac really needs to face JMM or Guzman soon, this is getting ridiculous technically. The Pac-Morales-Mab circle jerk just wore out fast, he has not lost of course and has won handily, but Solis also gave him some trouble, even though Pac KOed him to the body, where as with Calzaghe you have one of the most definitive performances of the decade over Lacy, the Bika fairly wide but ugly fight win and then of course the wipe out ordeal with Manfredo, not that Manfredo counts for anything at all and we're still kind of running off of the Lacy win, but Mikkel Kessler brings in a new dimension depending on how it's won. Floyd better blow Hatton out, that's all I'll say. ...but he will, no doubt.
Well here's the thing. Pacman DID lose once to Morales. It seems to be lost in all the shuffle when discussing P4P, which of course is as subjective as it can get. And simply looking at his fights, it was obvious that Pacman lost to a past it Morales and beat a shot one (to which Pacman most likely contributed the final push, but certainly not the only push). Calzaghe would have to obliterate Kessler for this move to even be on the table for me.
Cool deal mate, thanks for your input on the matter.:good I think a lot of us are seeing a lot of clarity to the P4P situation, we both have Dawson in the top 10 and I have Bernard at the last spot just for paper fairness and you excluded him wholly from the top 10 and that's definitley relevant to the situation. Anyway, I was proposed to do a pressure washing job tomarrow night a few weeks back and I qouted him at 75$ dollars for the driveway and 75$ for the back deck and shed and the moron is trying to act like I qouted him for 75$ for everything, so the Amsterdam account at ESB has to go deal with an utter moron for 10 minutes on the phone. I need to get these lower weight rankings in however. Hmm. I guess I'll get right on it.
These are the divisions I spend a disproportionate amount of time watching or following, and therefore am best qualified to comment on. P4P Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Manny Pacquiao Jean Marc Mormeck Bernard Hopkins Ricky Hatton Kelly Pavlik Israel Vasquez Juan Manuel Marquez Raphael Marquez Mikkel Kessler Heavyweight Wladimir Klitschko Ruslan Chagaev Sultan Ibragimov Oleg Maskaev Samuel Peter Nikolay Valuev Calvin Brock Vladimir Virchis Tony Thompson Jameel McCline Cruiserweight Jean-Marc Mormeck O'Neill Bell David Haye Steve Cunningham Enzo Maccarinelli Krzysztof Wlodarczyck Vadim Tokarev Darnell Wilson Marco Huck Tomasz Adamek Lightheavyweight Supermiddleweight Mikkel Kessler Anthony Mundine Joe Calzaghe Lucian Bute Carl Froch Denis Inkin Librado Andrade Allan Green Vitali Tsypko Alejandro Berrio Middleweight Jr. Middleweight Welterweight Floyd Mayweather Miguel Cotto Kermit Cintron Paul Williams Shane Mosley Antonio Margarito Luis Collazo Oktay Urkal Joshua Clottey Demetrius Hopkins
Now Cross Trainer, I am baffled how you have Mundine over Calzaghe, or Kessler for that matter, even though that is not as severe and you can explain your way out of it. I'm wondering if China hand Joe's crazyness has rubbed off on you.
Looking good, guys. Thanks for all the hard work. I think we're going to end up with some very close point totals. With more rankings to come, hopefully. (Everyone has been PMd to that effect except tobkhan, because his account doesn't accept PMs.) Also, remember that this month we're actually voting on champions for divisions, in cases where you believe there is one (and you have to identify him as such.) And you can go back and edit your rankings as you choose until voting concludes on Wednesday morning. And don't forget those emails with the Yes/No votes on the new nominations. Some very close calls at this point.
If Calzaghe wins against Kessler, no way hes not Rings #3 or I can no longer go with them for p4p..Id go with ESB's:good
I really want CHJ's rankings and for him to be apart of this and not get kicked out, he is essential to the committee. Cross probably has some customisation going on there and that's all well and fine, curious to see CHJ's.
Lampley's rules specify that you stop being the champion in any weightclass as soon as you step into the ring in a higher or lower one. Otherwise, PBF would be #1.
You are correct. It DOES say that. But being that our first set of rankings comes after PBF has unretired and he is fighting at 147 in a scheduled fight to defend a 147 title (Ring and WBC) I would assume he is still eligible for 147. However, if he moves out of the division after the first set of ESB rankings and from here on out, the Rules set in the Constitution would apply to him. Its how I interpreted it anyways.
Ah, rats. I was hoping to write that more clearly. I'll have to go back and edit. With respect to division identity, this was the weakest component of the Constitution. I just don't think a hard rule can effectively legislate the wildly volatile situations that will confront voters. Here it is: DIVISION IDENTITY Because fighters change divisions, return, and hover above with so much regularity and under a wide variety of circumstances, common logic should dictate to which division a fighter belongs. In case of ambiguity or in situations where there is a dispute, the matter should be taken to vote, either during a monthly vote or as a Special Vote. For Champions, the 365-day rule applies. In situations where a fighter gains enough votes to be ranked for two different divisions, he will be ranked in the division where he ranks highest -- and in the event of a tie, his most recent division will count -- and not listed in the other division. In that other division, the next-highest vote getter will move into the rankings and the rankings themselves will adjust accordingly. Naturally, the idea is to prevent such a phenomenon from occurring by virtue either of discussion among voters about a fighter's division, or settled by a vote. __________ In other words, I think if you want Mayweather at 147, you can rank him at 147. (Or name him Champion, if you prefer.)
Cross, quick question, something I missed even. Why Jean Marc Mormeck at 3? He was KOed by Bell, barely beat Bell the second time(Bell is not that great to begin with) and he's not been very active. He does not even have a resume comparable to Wladimir Klitschko's HW resume and H2H with his stamina issue's, he doesn't bode so well. I'm really curious here mate...:thumbsup