ESB Top 20: Final Elimination Round (PLEASE PARTICIPATE)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Dec 4, 2010.


  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Why the hell are so many of you including Fitzsimmons over Willis? Are you guys doing a "The best guys that fought at HW list" or a "best HW list?"

    Why is even Langford on some peoples list and not Willis? Willis got the better of their series, and was the more consistent of the two as a fighter.

    Guess you're right McGrain... Willis is pretty damn underrated/under-appreciated.
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I think outside of Uzcudun all were Top3, you can also throw in Sharkey, Louis and Neusel. There aren´t 10 hws with more Top3 wins than him.

    No, he was not! He just came of a draw with the reigning world heavyweight champion. How is that "an aging former ww"?

    Sharkey just beat Schmeling very controversally. Most had Schmeling winning, the term "robbed" comes from that very fight because after the decision was announced Schmelin´gs manager Joe Jacobs scremed the famous line "we wuz robbed". Then Sharkey went on and drawed with Walker. Then Schmeling beat Walker to a pulp. Those were the three best hws at that moment.

    The only losses that mean something are the ones against Baer, Hamas and Louis. Schmeling also beat Hamas and Louis. Losing against Baer, or Louis, isn´t a shame and that fight was about even after 10. Baer said Schmeling had him really hurt at one point and that he was lucky Schmeling didn´t get it.



    A win over prime Louis is better than that. And he has more depth. I just don´t see any case of ranking Bowe above him but then I´m not particularly high on Bowe.

    I don´t think Bruce Willis had even one fight at heavyweight though. ;)

    I have Sullivan in instead of Wills the only reason is that Sullivan needs to be in that vid. He started it all.
     
  3. di tullio

    di tullio Guest

    Because I like Archie... more. None of the guys were easy to take off of the list and it came down to that.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,672
    27,387
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  5. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Muhammad Ali
    Joe Louis
    Rocky Marciano
    George Foreman
    Wladimir Klitschko
    Lennox Lewis
    Mike Tyson
    Joe Frazier
    Larry Holmes
    Jack Dempsey
    Jim Jefferies
    Evander Holyfield
    Jack Johnson
    Max Schmeling
    Gene Tunney
    Sonny Liston
    Floyd Patterson
    Riddick Bowe
    Ken Norten
    Archie Moore
     
  6. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    01. Muhammad Ali
    02. Joe Louis
    03. Lennox Lewis
    04. George Foreman
    05. Joe Frazier
    06. Jersey Joe Walcott
    07. Floyd Patterson
    08. Max Schmeling
    09. Mike Tyson
    10. Evander Holyfield
    11. Rocky Marciano
    12. Jack Dempsey
    13. Jim Jeffries
    14. Ezzard Charles
    15. Peter Jackson
    16. Harry Wills
    17. Sonny Liston
    18. Wladimir Klitschko
    19. Sam Langford
    20. Jack Johnson
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Because he had over 100 fights, was 2-3 weightclasses removed from his WW prime, and over 30. It's a testament to walker and amazing he drew with Sharkey and beat Uzcudun. After the Schemling fight he couldn't recapture the LHW championship.

    It's crazy thinking of Walker as one of the three best HWs. Almost like thinking of Greb beating Dempsey. Just seems a little far-fetched. Obviously qualifies if that's where the term originated.

    Debatable, we're talking about the HW champion of the world in Holyfield. Louis is consistently marked as being green or pre-prime. Maybe it's just revisionism, even the Joe Louis doc said he was enjoy the high life and playing golf as opposed to training.

    Harry Willis has a case to be rated over Dempsey, let alone Sullivan. Why did you rank Langford over him? As far as P4P or as a fighter that's one thing but at HW that just seems wrong. Willis got the better of their series and beat better opposition and was more consistent at HW.
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
     
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    What I think is sort of interesting is I have 11 names post 1955 (Marciano). Sort of mid-way split (I didn't include Sullivan and 19th century guys).

    Replacing Schemling with Bowe would make it 10 and 10 for each time-split.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,672
    27,387
    Feb 15, 2006
    I have probably learned more about Schmeling from the newspaper acounts after the first Hamas fight, than from all others combined!

    In his prime Schmeling would have done this, or that .

    He would have feinted with the overhand right, then landed a sneaky left hook to the solar plexus, then landed an uppercut!

    They described a few tricks, that I later picked up on film, having missed them previously!
     
  11. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    So? He came of a draw with the hw champ, so he was not an aging former ww but a legitimate hw, a Top3 hw in fact. Walker could have never recapture the lhw championship because he never was lhw champion. Anyway, Schmeling could give career ending beatings, ask Steve Hamas.
    Saying Walker was a former aging ww is revisionist.

    Yes, it is crazy. But these guys were that good. Walker once said he prefers fighting hws to smaller guys because they are so slow and unskilled.

    Louis just beat Carnera and Baer. Many people think the Baer fight was, outside of the second Schmeling fight, his best performance. Yes, it is revisionist history.

    Harry Wills has. Harry Willis hasn´t. ;)
    Yes, Wills definitly has an argument to be ranked over Dempsey, Sullivan and Langford. Like I said, I only have Sullivan in there because he needs to be in there. It all began with him. Wills is the only guy I could let of without feeling too bad.
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Schmeling is a very unusual fighter with some subtile traits you don´t get on first glance. A bit like Marciano. For esample, hee always stood at a bit of an angle to his opponents that made it hard for them to land clean and easier for him to land a lead right. That was odd and awkward for his opponents - in recent times Carl Froch is actually doing something similar.
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,639
    Mar 17, 2010
    Please!!

    I need more lists guys! Thanks to all those who made a list. Now let's see the rest of you post your, don't be shy!
     
  14. Nick Balsamo

    Nick Balsamo Member Full Member

    343
    5
    Feb 20, 2006
    Muhammad Ali
    Joe Louis
    Larry Holmes
    George Foreman
    Lennox Lewis
    Sonny Liston
    Jack Johnson
    Jack Dempsey
    Jim Jefferies
    Rocky Marciano
    Mike Tyson
    Joe Frazier
    Evander Holyfield
    Riddick Bowe
    Ezzard Charles
    Joe Walcott
    Gene Tunney
    Floyd Patterson
    Sam Langford
    John L Sullivan
     
  15. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I am sure i will miss an obvious one, but off the top of my head:

    1. Ali
    2. Louis
    3. Johnson
    4. Sullivan
    5. Marciano
    6. Jeffries
    7. Tyson
    9. Holmes
    10. Lewis
    11. Foreman
    12. Dempsey
    13. Walcott
    14. Fitzsimmons
    15. Corbett
    16. Tunney
    17. Frazier
    18. Holyfield
    19. Bowe
    20. Liston

    (not necessessarilly in order and Klitchskos not considereed). And it must be said that this is an ubelievably difficulct choice, to leave some guys off. Leaving out Jackson, BAer, Schmelling, Langford, Wills, charles, Walcott and several others just seems plain wrong. But someone has to miss out i suppose.