ESPN Heavyweight Title Lineage

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Nov 20, 2012.


  1. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    just started watching, ****ing love it! tommy burns looks surprisingly not shitty on film
     
  2. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,817
    19,075
    Jun 13, 2011
    rir 37
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,401
    21,835
    Sep 15, 2009
    The whole 1v2 thing according to those who follow linearity.

    In theory Ali remained champ till he retired and whilst Holmes assumed the number 1 spot he never beat number 2 and a parkinsons riddled Ali doesn't count.

    I think he was the best HW out there from Norton till retirement but I'm just saying his status doesn't hold true when 1v2 is enforced.
     
  4. Johnstown

    Johnstown Boxing Addict banned

    5,695
    12
    Aug 30, 2010
    the dempsey bit is a bit annoying..they show a brief bit of willard dempsey, than they show him beating up cowboy lutterll...
     
  5. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    ESPN is stupid.

    All a bunch of Calzhage nuthuggers
     
  6. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Pounchin powar calculateur Full Member

    2,372
    87
    Sep 13, 2012
    :rofl
     
  7. Jear

    Jear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,720
    12
    Jul 27, 2004
    I dont consider Hart and Burns as linear champs. Johnson defeating Jefferies is the passing of the torch.

    Lineage stops with Tunney but as only one title was at stake it is reestablished with Schmelling. Ditto with Marciano and Patterson.

    Holmes defeating Ali maintained genuine lineage. Lewis' retirement has muddied the waters as now with the splintered title it is much harder to reestablish. Who and when it is/was reestablished is open to real debate
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,401
    21,835
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm surprised you consider a champ
    still to be a champ even when he's retired.
     
  9. Jear

    Jear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,720
    12
    Jul 27, 2004
    for me their return allows genuine lineage to continue. where possible it is about beating the man who beat the man
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Good find, my thoughts, firstly ESPN MUST HAVE HIDDEN FOOTAGE

    Corbett - not half bad, balance isn't great but not half bad use of angles, the jab, the counter right, some of his opponents were rank novices though that any decent boxer would make a fool of

    Fitz - not too bad counter punching style

    Jeffries - little footage but he doesn't look like he has any basic level of skill, looks like he just wants to walk to his opponent and hold and wrestle/throw, which I suppose reflects his wrestling background, but not even using a jab or any lead punches

    Burns - decent jab and counter right, looks a bit like a lesser Mickey Walker
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,401
    21,835
    Sep 15, 2009
    It just seems a bit worthless to me. If Lewis came back today and lost to chiaora would you class him the new champion?