The whole 1v2 thing according to those who follow linearity. In theory Ali remained champ till he retired and whilst Holmes assumed the number 1 spot he never beat number 2 and a parkinsons riddled Ali doesn't count. I think he was the best HW out there from Norton till retirement but I'm just saying his status doesn't hold true when 1v2 is enforced.
the dempsey bit is a bit annoying..they show a brief bit of willard dempsey, than they show him beating up cowboy lutterll...
I dont consider Hart and Burns as linear champs. Johnson defeating Jefferies is the passing of the torch. Lineage stops with Tunney but as only one title was at stake it is reestablished with Schmelling. Ditto with Marciano and Patterson. Holmes defeating Ali maintained genuine lineage. Lewis' retirement has muddied the waters as now with the splintered title it is much harder to reestablish. Who and when it is/was reestablished is open to real debate
for me their return allows genuine lineage to continue. where possible it is about beating the man who beat the man
Good find, my thoughts, firstly ESPN MUST HAVE HIDDEN FOOTAGE Corbett - not half bad, balance isn't great but not half bad use of angles, the jab, the counter right, some of his opponents were rank novices though that any decent boxer would make a fool of Fitz - not too bad counter punching style Jeffries - little footage but he doesn't look like he has any basic level of skill, looks like he just wants to walk to his opponent and hold and wrestle/throw, which I suppose reflects his wrestling background, but not even using a jab or any lead punches Burns - decent jab and counter right, looks a bit like a lesser Mickey Walker
It just seems a bit worthless to me. If Lewis came back today and lost to chiaora would you class him the new champion?