ESPN: Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Miguel Ángel Marriaga & Raymundo Beltrán vs. Bryan Vásquez RBR.

A few weeks from now... we'll see a passive aggressive pandering thread from you pretending to be a Loma fan. "I'm a HUGE Loma fan.... But...."

 

You haven't follow Floyds whole career to say something like this.

 

You wanted a prime RJ show, Loma gaves it to us tonight. He showed more against Sosa, but tonight he just so effortlessly embarrassed and destroyed Marriaga, RJ-like, and may have outdone him.

 

What are you going on about? I saw IB make a moronic post, so I called him out for it. Nothing to do with witch-hunting Lomachenko.

 

On twitter, people are saying 'first time seeing Lomachenko, will be watching him again, technically perfect etc.'

 

To toy Marriaga like that, who had a virtually even fight with Oscar Valdez, that's something.

 

Marriaga is a big puncher, with a lot of flaws. He isn't a great fighter. He is, however, a top 15ish guy with a solid puncher's chance potential to knock out 95% of the population of the super featherweight division, with either hand. Lomachenko just toyed with & stopped him (whereas neither Walters nor Valdez could).

Now, who is Julius Indongo? The guy that exposed Troyanovsky, okay, wonderful. And who exactly was Troyanovsky? Who did he actually beat to substantiate all the hype that somehow mysteriously surrounded him for a brief while? Go through all my posts on Troyanovsky, you can see I was calling somebody doing what Indongo did to him from when Troyanovsky was a green prospect. When journeymen at Euro level were kicking his ass here and there. So that's where Indongo got belt #1. Then he 'unifies' with Ricky Burns, who as of then happened to be holding one more belt that he picked up vacant after beating Euro level Di Rocco and defending in a ROBBERY against complete unknown and unheard-of Kyril Relikh. So yeah, he's a "unified champ" but in the most sham and strictly-on-paper way imaginable.

 

Btw you call blackclouds a blacksupermacist, but he was here with me and others scoring the N'dam/Murata fight. He had it pretty much a shut out for Murata, if he was such a black supremacist why wouldnt he give 3-4 rounds to N'dam that you possibly could have gave him if you gave him every benefit of the doubt and counted non-clean punches?

 

I love Loma, he's the best in the world, and tonight is boxing at its best. But no one should be misrepresenting other great fighters opposition to praise Loma. I do think Marriaga is better, but he's absolutely not a harder puncher than Indongo, and he was only surviving tonight. Indongo I guarantee will be going after Crawford trying to take his head off.

 

Hahaha Teddy atlas just said he would like to see loma vs rigo and f'n Steven a smith said I don't know Rigo reminds me of Nicholas Walters and we saw what happened to him. Espn really needs to look into who they have talking boxing

 

Not taking anything from Loma... but it was a 'push down' NOT a knock down.

 

I don't think unifying all of the major belts is a waste of time. It's only been done twice in the last twenty years by Tszyu and Hopkins. That's special. I want to see Crawford and Golovkin do it too.

 

What's moronic about the post? Indongo really is nothing special, good but far from great.

You sure as hell were witch hunting Loma for this fight.. While trying to masquerade as a fan. All while defending Wilders **** poor voluntary defenses and The Pimp... Wonder why the guy who also hates Loma but defends Wilder and The Pimp liked your post? What a shocking coincidence!

 

27 fights, 26 KOs. Currently rated #7 in the world. You sure about that?