ESPN: Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Miguel Ángel Marriaga & Raymundo Beltrán vs. Bryan Vásquez RBR.

Who calls anyone who doesn't suck off certain fighters black supremacists. That **** is quite pathetic while you hypocrites cry about sjw in the lounge. Don't get me started. Getting a mod position is not an accomplishment on this site. We're the Breit Bart/fake news of boxing forums.

And his ***** ass follows me around trying his hardest to get my my attention like a groupie. What does that do for my rank? Go ahead and hype your fellow race crybaby sjw guy up lmao

 

I'm the biggest Crawford stan on here. I like Crawford more than Lomachenko. Anybody that reads my posts knows all this.

Having said that, I keep it real. Despite the belts situation, Indongo will be EASY WORK for Bud - as easy as Marriaga was for Loma. This is about levels, and styles. Marriaga was good enough to hang at world level with certain people and to KO some cans and journegmen, but is several levels below Loma and stylistically tailor made. Likewise, Indongo was good enough to beat two certain people at world level under specific circumstances and otherwise kayo a bunch of nobodies in Namibia, but is several levels below Crawford and stylistically tailor made for him.

Capice?

 

Well I will leave you gents to discuss race/racism/troyanovsky/indongo/crawford for the rest of the night, I'm going to bed. Ciao.

 

Yeah no. Be honest IB. Your whole point of bringing up Indongo is because you assumed that those were criticizing Lomachenko were Crawford fans. I don't think you're racist at all, but yes I do think your intentions were blatant.

 

Uh, no, I assumed we were all mature adults capable of being fans of both fighters and behaving objectively, like me. Sorry, my mistake.

I was drawing an interesting parallel for the mere sake of drawing an interesting parallel. I would think my reputation for not playing these stupid little agenda games like 99% of you children on here would speak for itself so that you would never make such insinuations about my "intentions", but oh well.

 

By saying that Marriaga was good enough to hang with world level boxers like "valdez", I can easily go through Valdez's resume and say who the **** has he beat. Let's be completely honest here, as for Walters since you like to bring up Burns being shot, let's bring up how Walters best wins are career shot FLYWEIGHTS.

I don't care if you're a massive Crawford stan. Your intentions were obvious. You only brought up Crawford because you were in a pmsing bitchy mood and wanted to get back at people you perceived as "Crawford fans", because they were shitting on your guy. Like I said I don't think your Loma dickriding has anything to do with race, but I do think your tirade has to do with you being in a bitchy pms-y mood.

 

Mature adults, says the guy that has been bitching and crying non-stop for the past 2 hours. Okay.

 

Exactly, YOUR reputation is why I think that your intentions were obvious. I have enough respect for you as a boxing mind to not making moronic statements like Marriaga is a better opponent than Indongo.

Maybe it's my mistake for having that much respect for you knowledge. Maybe you truly believe it.

 

Indongo solely on the fact that he has world titles and that it's unification... But judging on their actual abilities? It's pretty debatable. Marriage arguably showed more in a loss to blue chipper Valdez than Indongo did again washed up burns and mediocre, badly flawed and mid-late 30s Troyanovsky. He had a completely valid point that anyone who glances beyond the surface could easily see.

 

There's a lot of unfinished chinny guys out there. Some of them do alright. Linares got iced the same way Troy did, two or three times even, but he's come back and cleaned his name up a little. Jacobs too. Some guys get knocked out a couple of times, come back and become great champions: Patterson, Klitschko, Pacquiao, Hearns. Quite frankly, **** happens. I'm not saying this will be the case with Troy, but I don't like to write guys off with their first loss.

 

I don't give a **** about people slagging off Lomachenko, his performance speaks for itself and if people want to go with the "Marriaga is a bum" hater narrative, good for them. I literally don't care.

Now where you make the leap in logic to assume that I am conflating irrational Lomachenko haters with Crawford fans (of which I ****ing AM ONE), not sure what you're smoking.

You're dead wrong.

 

What has Valdez done exactly again? You want to **** on the Russian and Burns, but who did Valdez beat?

 

You claimed he would never win a title let alone defend it multiple times so get off your high horse. You also referred to Beterbiev as the LHW Abdusalamov just the other day, which is very disrespectful especially considering the man's medical condition.

 

Ok sure. It's not like I'm going to get you to admit it, but I'm pretty sure anyone that reads this thread can see right through that.

 

It's hardly surprising he brought up Crawford, his fight has been advertised on ESPN the entire night.