ESPN: Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Miguel Ángel Marriaga & Raymundo Beltrán vs. Bryan Vásquez RBR.

Troyanovsky isn't Jorge Linares though. More like the Russian version of Jason Litzau. Had the American Boy ever been out in right situation to punch his way to a brief title reign he would've been the prototype for Trojan.

 

Exactly, the first time I posted about Crawford vs. Indongo was literally the moment after they SHOWED THE ****ING GRAPHIC FOR IT AND WERE TALKING ABOUT IT ON ESPN.

Stupid ass talking like I brought them up outta the ether just so I could "trigger" Crawford fans, when I'm the biggest Crawford fan on the board. (and don't like Lomachenko even 10% as much as I like Crawford)

Freaking ridiculous. "I know for a fact what your intentions were!". No you stupid piece of ****, you literally don't. You just made all that stupid **** up.

 

Bringing Crawford is fine. But bringing up a moronic comparison saying that Marriaga is a better opponent than Indongo means that either IB is trolling and trying to trigger people(which I've seen him do with Pacquiao fans and admit it), or my perception of him was completely off.

 

Well, yeah. And if my aunt had a ***** she'd be my uncle. The fact is that he has that power. He has an eraser to undo his mistakes, so did Foreman, so did Marciano, so did Froch to a certain extent. Saying that he only wins because he's a monstrous puncher kind of defeats the point. A win is a win. Lemieux has all kinds of flaws, but when you can punch like him oftentimes that's all you need.

 

Ok fair enough IB. But just for the record, the reason I have all these assumptions is that you yourself have admitted that you've trolled "pac" fans because of the dumb statements you've made. So your maturity comment earlier is kind of comical when you've admitted to this. Btw this is extremely recent, so please don't even try to play it off like you didn't say it. Unlike you, I'll be honest, and say yes, I've done the same thing that you've admitted to doing with Pac fans. After seeing that post and this dumb comparison can you blame me for coming to this conclusion?

 

Indeed, we are all of us worms, but I do believe that I am a glow worm. -Mark Twain

 

Dude you're a stupid little *****. You're reading MY posts - MINE - through the crazy ass paranoid lens of someone that has been involved with all this passive agenda nonsense on forums for way too long. You need to step back and realize who the **** you're talking to/about. If you want to make assumptions and ascribe those sort of intentions to anybody else's posts on this board, fine. But I think it goes without saying I'm above that ****.

 

Yes, it's not like you just didn't bring up how you troll and say dumb **** about Pacquiao, because *******s are awful fans. Sorry for respecting your boxing knowledge enough to think that you wouldn't say one of the most moronic things I've seen on this post without an agenda.

 

Yep, you're totally above that ****. Which is why you admitted to trolling "Pac" fans. I never thought you were above this kind of behavior at all. My perception of you is someone who knew their boxing, wasn't racist, but also did have a temper. I've seen you go off on this forum often times. So stop acting like you're "above ****" and better than everyone.

 

But dude I'm not going to throw Crawford under the bus to "protect" Lomachenko's image or some nonsense like that when Im not even losing sleep over some people not appreciating Loma's skills. I'm really not on the guy's dick like that, believe me.

The original comparison was because I'm staying consistent with my same old self and not viewing my favorites through rose colored lenses and saying their boo doesn't stink.

Crawford is amazing. He by now has more than earned an 'easy unification. But the fact is that Indongo really is way too easy for Crawford right now and is a paper belt holder (partially unified or no) who poses no greater risk than Marriaga did tonight.

And that's really that. No hidden agenda, that is all I wanted to say. No double talk, no subterfuge, no subbing in one person to make a strawman point about someone unrelated - that is the stuff I am above. When I talked about trolling annoying Pac fans it was a matter of needling them about JMM deserving to be 4-0 (which i do happen to believe) and playfully exaggerating the significance of certain things like him being KTFO by Torrecampo "in his prime", but it was always clear when I was taking the **** and when I wasn't. All the schoolyard games people are playing on here daily, manipulating facts and bending logic to serve agendas, that stuff I don't mess with.

 

Mr. Maturity. How many times have you called me a stupid little ****, and made insults the past couple posts? Yeahhhh you're totally above it. The fact that you brought up maturity is so comical. You're above everyone man.

 

Neither of us are going to change each others mind. It's just hard for me to believe that you'd say Marriaga is the better opponent without an agenda. But okay.