Espn2 alert!! They'll talk about pac not fighting afro fighters!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Marcelo, Nov 18, 2010.


  1. RightHandLead17

    RightHandLead17 Active Member Full Member

    1,447
    0
    Nov 11, 2010
    guys, let me elaborate on what B-Hop is saying; he's saying that MOST African American fighters have a style based on handspeed, headmovement, footwork, and all around slickness exp. Pernell Whitaker, the Great Ali, Roy Jones Jr, Floyd Mayweather Jr, etc. Now the criteria for a PacMan opponent is, straight forward, no headmovement, no handspeed, no footwork, no defense overall, and just recently coming off a huge loss,...now Arum says Pac's next fight will be against an AA fighter and that will most likely be Shane Mosley and he does not fight the criteria of a slick african american fighter anymore and in my opinion he never did
     
  2. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Great post. :good

    SSM is no sucka, but Mosleys days of having the handspeed to make up for his "direct approach" are long behind him.
     
  3. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,392
    5,907
    May 18, 2006
    You can be as slick as you want but you gotta have HEART and chin.
     
  4. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Did you see Round 2 of FMJ/SSM? Did you see him versus Chavez? If you don't think he is tough YDKSAB.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fco0PmJX8bw[/ame]

    Anyway, tough is stupid in boxing. Hit and not get hit. You ain't got to be tough if you have skills... :deal

    or if you keep weight draining recently knocked out one dimensional fighters. :hey
     
  5. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    This :deal. It's not just about not getting hit because eventually you will get hit. It's how you respond when you get hit badly.
     
  6. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    OK. Three times Manny folded. Great observation. :good
     
  7. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,422
    123
    Feb 27, 2008
    Talk about inventing an issue out of nothing.

    Only high profile AF Pac could have fought was Shane in late 2009, instead he fought Cotto (who was his first real test at 147), omg lets crucify him.

    Bhop was giving a ton of credit to Pac last year, recognized that he is P4P etc. Now he just brought this nonsense because he is hoping it will somehow fuel the Mayweather-Pac fight which his company might co-promote.
     
  8. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,422
    123
    Feb 27, 2008
    Shane wanted to pick on Pac after he beat David Diaz? At least get your time-line right before you discredit him.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Really? Pac only fights high profile guys now?

    Or does he take challenges? Zahir Raheem, Nate Campbell, Torry Holt, etc... None of those guys existed nor where they ever worthy...

    :roll:
     
  10. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,422
    123
    Feb 27, 2008
    LOL, if those names are the best you can come up with it ruins any argument you have. Pacquiao had ONE fight at 135 before moving up to fight DLH, Hatton, Cotto. All three of those were seen as much tougher match ups then Raheem (who did nothing after beating Morales and was finished by 2006 while Pac was still at a lower weight) and Cambell who also did a whole lot of nothing after beating Diaz.

    So you have Cambell at 135, a weight he fought at once and Shane at 147, he fought Cotto instead.

    Torry Holt, WTF. At least get your **** straight, and Holt didn't deserve anything.
     
  11. rabmag

    rabmag Dead Game Full Member

    1,408
    1
    May 17, 2009
    I'd rather see Pacquiao vs. the winner of Bradley vs. Alexander than Mosley. :twisted:
     
  12. rabmag

    rabmag Dead Game Full Member

    1,408
    1
    May 17, 2009
    You're really grasping at straws.

    I don't think you realize how ridiculously bias you come off toward black fighters. Do you even care? It predisposes your future posts to complete lunacy. How can anyone take what you say seriously? You sound like Malcom X Jr.
     
  13. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Look man, the case against the guy is super weak at lower weights. The best name there is Zahir Raheem who made a PERFECT case for Pac to face him much the same as Mosley did. In both cases? Pac chose the path of least resistance. Who cares what any fighter does AFTER he earns a shot? You keep earning shots and passed over I wonder how disillusioned with the job you will become?

    Pac has now passed through 140, 147, and now at 154 and there were, according to Pac's team, no Black Americans worthy of being faced. Really?

    Like being a 130 or below champ and never fighting a Mexican. BS!
     
  14. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    And you, like the ******* you are, are taking my comments completely out of context because it makes you feel good.

    I am not throwing those guys out there as though Pac MUST face them. My point was they EXIST! Zahir Raheem made just as good a case for himself as Mosley. Better actually.
     
  15. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,588
    34,406
    Jun 23, 2005
    You can't talk sense into these idiots. If PBF had fought his whole career at 130-154 and not faced one Latino fighter people here would be up in arms saying he ducked Latino fighters but since it's Pac and they like him it's okay and you can't call him out on it.:-(