Eubank-Benn II

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by JeremyCorbyn, Nov 14, 2017.


  1. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,085
    Feb 16, 2013

    The slight money difference was probably due to Benn having a rather big loyal fanbase, they travelled and supported him everywhere. People related to Benn more than they related to Eubank.

    Eubank was a love to hate figure, although loved more when he retired, it has to be remembered he insulted boxing, boxers and the boxing public by once saying "boxing was a mugs game" and made it clear he fought for money, not legacy, not proving he was the best or having great fights.

    So Benn would have put more backsides on seats, he was the slightly bigger draw at that time in my opinion.
     
    Howitzer1888 and JeremyCorbyn like this.
  2. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,569
    Nov 27, 2010
    During that era there also was a greater significance attached to the title you had, particularly with the Big Green belt.

    Benn's WBC title was considered more prestigious than Eubank's WBO version, even though Eubank had arguably fought better opposition at 168.

    I don't have viewing figures to hand, but I imagine that Benn was a more consistent draw than Eubank at the time. Eubank's fighting style and persona out of the ring were much better suited to the role of antagonist, so he needed the right foil to capture the public's imagination. Benn had the classic mix of danger and vulnerability that meant he was rarely in a dull fight.
     
    Howitzer1888, N17 and JeremyCorbyn like this.
  3. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,153
    3,955
    Aug 2, 2013
    Still not even close. EVERYONE watched it!
     
    JeremyCorbyn likes this.
  4. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,153
    3,955
    Aug 2, 2013
    Eubank outsmarted Benn, because his 850K was NET, and Benn's 1Mill was Gross. So Eubank actually took home significantly more than Benn. Andy Ayling can confirm this.
     
    JeremyCorbyn, Howitzer1888 and N17 like this.
  5. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,085
    Feb 16, 2013

    What a nice little fact, I didn't know that, that's why I love this site, I'm always learning something.
     
    Twentyman and JeremyCorbyn like this.
  6. williams7383

    williams7383 TKO 6 Klit Lickers Full Member

    1,604
    548
    Jun 15, 2009
    Would Benns WBC belt bring more to the table than the not so highly regarded at the time WBO strap held by Eubank.
     
    JeremyCorbyn likes this.
  7. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,153
    3,955
    Aug 2, 2013
    It was the only reason King got involved, but Eubank insisted he was taking home more than Benn one way or another. Once King saw Eubank's charisma at the press conferences, and mass appeal here, it was Chris Eubank he wanted his claws into and insisted on the three-fight tie to him after the event. Eubank outsmarted even Don King by pointing out the contract read only the winner and loser would be tied, so he was free to fly!
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2017
    JeremyCorbyn and williams7383 like this.
  8. jm2729v

    jm2729v Active Member Full Member

    884
    620
    Jun 15, 2016
    Pre-Christianity Nigel Benn was bloody intense
     
    JeremyCorbyn likes this.
  9. JeremyCorbyn

    JeremyCorbyn Active Member Full Member

    742
    776
    Jul 15, 2017
    I think they were both going to have to fight in America as part of the deal (maybe not in the rematch), but I don't think either of their hearts were in it. They were settled here, making good money, and they were both a big deal in this country.
     
  10. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,153
    3,955
    Aug 2, 2013
    King was happy to keep Benn in London but wanted Eubank over in the US