Eubank: Calzaghe/Froch/Benn were LUCKY

100% correct :happy

 

of course eubank was favourite, due to his known record of years of being a champ, a HOF record versus the 25 year old JC's no record acheivement. Who you going to put up as the favourite...duh...


If you had secretly cloned Joe Calzaghe back in the 1990s, raised him in Wales running up hills and changed your clones name to anything (lets say Joe Bailey, for arguments sake, it seems appropriate) and then today put him in the ring with the real JC, old Joe Calzaghe would be the favourite by a long way because of his HOF record. Wouldnt stop young cloned Joe Bailey from kicking old Joe C's ass.

common sense, anyone knows that.

Thats why I have no objection to Joe signing on to face only faded or shot oldies when he was 35, last thing I wanted to see was our sole British hero Joe getting knocked out by the next bright young thing. 35 year old Froch should maybe take a leaf out of Joes book and start cherrypicking fortysomethings now, not that he will take that advice, the nutter, he just wants the best no matter what.

 

At the time Prince was a big undefeated LHW puncher who was more noticed than Calzaghe

 

I could correct you on many aspects of what you have written. I guess you dont know SMW history that well before J Lacy burst on the scene, but Veit was a top world class SMW champ, with a better resume than most of the current SMWs

 

Eubank can **** off.

He's just flapping his gums to get intrest for his son, who will be no more than a British champion.

 

lol here we go SuperVeit, intercontinental man who couldnt keep even a minor world title is better than Bute and Froch..... oh yay...

 

Yes Froch should cherry pick, when he didnt, he lost to a Calzaghe leftover coming off a loss. That was a near 36 year old Calzaghe beating Kessler :hi: that Froch lost to.
What 40 year old did Calzaghe cherry pick?

 

Like atberry and bailey said, Boxing News tipped Eubank to stop Calzaghe in 10, though the uk bookies had Calzaghe the favourite.

scar is a terrible poster.

 

I have to answer you in Bailey language - he never fought any 40somethings.

cheers, end of. best way with you.

 

Another duck pulled by you when questioned.
No doubt you will reply, but not with an answer to the question asked. Sure sign of ducking

 

answer in Bailey language -I wont name the fortysomethings Joe faced once he passed 35, its not like you have memory problems over those names, is it? duh.

So in Baileyworld thats.... GREAT WIN FOR CALZAGHE!!



Probably escaped your attention that I was supporting your point. heyho. not to worry.

 

Must be the same 40 something that is C Dawsons biggest win years later

 

yes, I can see how in Baileyspeak, prime Chad issuing a 12 round beatdown to a 47 year old that everyone saw coming is Chads toughest challenge and greatest victory ever, and Chad should retire happy now.

in that context its also a...GREAT WIN FOR CALZAGHE!!! YEEYY!


you are so right Bailey. but please stop, everyone is agreeing with you. so now we can all get back to talking about Eubank.

 

Did Chad win the first fight?

 

no mate i said lets talk about Eubank, not Calzaghe again.

I didnt see the first Chad-Bhop disqualification, but I can only assume you see it as a GREAT AWAY WIN FOR CALZAGHE.


I and everyone agrees completely with you about whatever your opinion is of the disqualification, now lets move on. please.