Eubank hints Froch couldn't run with his era (New)

well he got smashed up by hearns for quite a while, and lets atleast admit hearns punch resistance isnt very good, and hes not a natural middleweight and slightly past it. he wouldnt get froch out of there like he did hearns and he would been tko'd like groves in the 8th but not by a huge punch just a big flurry after getting worked into the ropes. your using bad examples of fighters doing well but losing, think again before you put more names in the hat.

 

no he gets outboxed easier :rofl

 

and barkley did vs a 37 lightweight who outhustled him :rofl

imagine tyson being scared of a fighter who got beaten by a lightweight. jog on.

 

Ray Close anyone

 

ye he may been able to box a bit, but just because there were better fighters in the 80s and 90s doesnt mean he'd beat froch, froch would do okay in the 90s era, be top 10-15 smw but styles make fights. and froch gets outboxed by speedy defensive fighters not head first fighters like barkley as you put it.
thats the reason i pick froch ahead hes achieved more, in a weak era. but success breeds success. once barkley beat hearns he went onto get beaten by maske,toney and a few others. hes too inconsitenent and inconsitency aint the good when your putting people h2h/

 

Eubank , benn and calzaghe beat froch no doubt

 

Enjoyed reading the boxing knowledge lads, good stuff, but Bulldog, you are been so biased, lepen is speaking sense.

 

Wrong! The only one speaking sense here is Bulldog24. Lepinthehood doesn't know enough about Steve Collins and he doesn't realise the talent pool back then was 20 times wider than it is today.