no its not i would also pick fitzgerald over cotto especially these are big punchers at 160 we are talking about spike lost to eubank and saunders who are monsters compared to little cotto and canelo
I agree that CEJ beats Cotto. He is too big. CEJ v Canelo is a damn good fight and I've been saying it for years. I would probably pick CEJ via UD. On a side note, Spike loses to both Cotto and Canelo. Different levels.
there is a reason why canelo is afraid to fight at 160 eubank is to big and strong at the weight he most likely even stops him
yes Canelo has done **** at 160 and there is a reason he wont fight at that weight khan managed to even do very well against canelo until he got caught he thats a former light welterweight at 160 against stocky tough fighter like spike canelo would be in for a war canelo cant even hurt welterweights most of the time canelo landing heavy shots on cotto and mosley who have not go even a ounce of the punch resistance of many 160 fighters doesnt bode to well
Yes that reason is called GGG and he's the only reason. Apart from Golovkin, Canelo obliterates the majority of the 160 division.
not it is not i would pick at least 10 mws of the top of my head to beat canelo :rofl:rofl canelo cant even obliterate welterweights against big 160 fighters he will have no chance
Very possible, we all go on about canelo vs ggg but I don't think canelo does too well with any legitimate high ranking middle which is more the reason we have had this 155 nonsense, not just to block ggg but all of them. Eubank is the weak end of the 160 big boys but even he would do canelo.
you got small welt weights standing up to canelos power lol imagine 160 fighters? they would die of laughter