Eubank Sr: 'Toney is the greatest middleweight of all-time!'

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bulldog24, Mar 25, 2016.


  1. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    skill wise he probably was

    "this guy slips punches in his sleep" teddy atlas
     
  2. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,332
    4,205
    Aug 2, 2013
    He bounced back by beating McCallum
     
  3. split_decision

    split_decision Electronic information tampers with your soul Full Member

    5,456
    1,244
    Apr 14, 2010
  4. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013
    Great shout :good
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,177
    Jun 23, 2005
    :deal
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    I'd read up on Greb if I were you.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    I can't envisage it.

    Ray's speed and power caused them issues.

    Look at Roy's speed and power, as well as the fact he was bigger and just as elusive.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    :good
     
  9. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,666
    29,206
    Feb 25, 2015
    He's got a point. While Hopkins and Toney are elite fighter they're a different style.

    Hearns is a better technical fighter than Jones. Jones would get outboxed and then finished.

    I can't imagine Jones really landing anything on Hearns. Tommy is too fast and too skilled.
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    Why would Roy have had an issue landing on Tommy?

    Look at his unorthodox variation of shots, his reach, coupled with otherworldly speed, with genuine one punch knockout power in either hand.

    You're telling me that Roy couldn't have taken him out, yet Ray, Marvin and Barkley did?

    Nonsense.
     
  11. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,666
    29,206
    Feb 25, 2015
    It has to do with styles IMO. Hearns was vulnerable to the caveman style of fighting. The F everything and just go for it bullrushing style. Hagler and Barkley just jumped him. And I don't think Jones presents those same challenges stylistically.

    Ray was actually getting outboxed by Hearns until Tommy ran out of gas and got caught. Modern boxing is 12 rounds though.

    I think Hearns stylistically has the edge over Jones. First Jones usually enjoyed an otherworldly speed advantage. While he's faster than Tommy it wouldn't be that much of a speed difference. And Tommy would certainly be the fastest fighter Jones had seen. Jones would't outclass him athletically anywhere near to the extent he did with Toney and Hopkins.

    In addition, Hearns is too solid technically and too gifted athletically to succumb to the traps and unorthodox of Jones Jr. Where Hopkins and Toney were just too slow and unathletic to respond.

    I see Hearns-Jones being like the rich man's version of Barrera Hamed. Where the unorthodox fighter finds a guy who's too gifted athletically and too skilled. And he gets picked apart and made to look sloppy against a well schooled boxer-puncher.
     
  12. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,042
    Jan 22, 2015
    Don't think I agree with Eubank as Best MW ever, but he clearly has one of the best chins of all time.:deal
     
  13. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Was there ever a fighter that lost and was 100%?
     
  14. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    Roy schooled him and Bhop would probably knock him out towards late.
     
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,714
    81,008
    Aug 21, 2012
    :yep