Eubanks vs Hopkins

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by robert ungurean, Nov 5, 2008.


  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,345
    15,450
    Jun 9, 2007
    Can't explain it but in my 28 yr involvment with Boxing I never saw Eubank fight.
    How would he fair against Hopkins?
     
  2. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Poorly:

    Style wise Hopkins is a horrible match up for Eubank. Hopkins is faster and craftier that Eubank and perfectly able to handle any of the psychology Eubank may use.

    Hopkins WU15 (10-5)
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Hopkins would win it, he'd be just better imo, but I really liked Eubank, a warrior the man was. That right hand can decapitate a man, and you do NOT see it coming, pounces in like a cheetah with it, good night.
     
  4. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    This would be another horrible fight.

    Hopkins had better stamina and better workrate (and it's not foten you say that). He was probably also a bit more aggressive. Eubank was a strong man though. His physical strength was amazing for a MW. I'd imagine a close fight with Hopkins superior output pulling him away at the end to just take a decision.
     
  5. stonerose

    stonerose Guest

    hopkins would win a pretty ugly fight. both men are very hard to hurt .
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hopkins would simply punnish Chris's technical errors but Eubank makes it hard for him and certainly turns up the pace in the championship rounds when hes well behind on points for a backburner of a finnish
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,785
    29,187
    Jun 2, 2006
    Pretty badly I think Hopkins is superir in just about every department ,Hopkins ,along with Jones and Toney would have exposed Eubanks ,imo.
     
  8. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    IF anything i'd say Eubank would have further exposed Toney as not the fighter the fanboys claim.Even if he loses.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,785
    29,187
    Jun 2, 2006
    Eubanks had great fights with Benn ,Watkins ,decent ones with Collins,Calzaghe and Thompson ,but he fought more than his share of dross in title defences,and won some dubious verdicts imo.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Toney and Eubank play the same game of counter puncher boxer, Toney does it better. The thread however is Eubank-BHOPs
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Both counter-punchers yes, Toney does it better yes, but the thing that Eubank has that Toney doesnt, is the footwork, someone with great feet can outmaneuvre Toney for me. Not too sure if Eubank's legs were quite great though, but possibly....
     
  12. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,342
    9,961
    Jun 23, 2008
    Eubank wouldnt stand a chance in hell. The man lost the first fight to Micheal Watson, and B-Hop was about a light year better than Watson. Hopkins by VERY clear UD.
     
  13. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,342
    9,961
    Jun 23, 2008
    Eubank wanted NO parts of Toney, and for good reason. JT would have kicked Eubank's ass!

    Eubank was a good fighter, but VASTLY overrated. He wouldnt beat ANY of the great middleweights.
     
  14. radianttwilight

    radianttwilight Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,539
    18
    May 5, 2007