Eusebio Pedroza vs Brian Mitchell

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Aug 9, 2025.


  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,059
    28,118
    Oct 12, 2010
    Pedroza certainly had the frame to be able to move up to 130 without any trouble. Assuming he’s just as effective at super featherweight how does he handle a guy like Brian Mitchell who was slick, crafty and clever?
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,254
    9,818
    Jun 23, 2008
    If we can assume Pedroza would be just as effective making the move up, then he outclases Mitchell. We're talking two different tiers of fighter here. Mitchell was merely 'very good'; I struggle to even consider him a great. Pedroza was an ATG.
     
  3. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,233
    31,606
    Jan 14, 2022
    If anything I think Mitchell gets a tad overrated on this forum honestly.

    Don't get me wrong Mitchell has a very eye pleasing style but his best win is a 7-5 decision over Tony Lopez apart from that there's not many other notable names.
     
    robert ungurean and Xplosive like this.
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,254
    9,818
    Jun 23, 2008
    Yup. Agreed 100%.

    He's one of the weaker champions to ever make the HOF.

    Very underwhelming resume. Nothing he ever did should make him a favorite over Pedroza.
     
    Dynamicpuncher likes this.
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,076
    8,463
    Jul 17, 2009
    Pedroza was a great fighter while Mitchell was a very good one.

    Pedroza scores shutout decision.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.