Exactly. I agree with you. I had no idea he was Pattersonesque in the chin department. Thank you for letting us know. 33 times! Could say he had a permanent case of the Chinavirus. Lol.
Eleven were while suffering with brain damage and seven were from a back injury. He had a much better chin than Patterson.
Why are you mad at me? Because we both agree Ez had no chin. You informed me of it. Then you get all flustered? I forgot you were the confused poster from the other thread who could not make up his mind. That is allright. You may be a goof but I like your contradictory postings. Lets just be friends G.
We don't both agree Charles had no chin, because if he had no chin, he'd never have done what he did. If you thought I was agreeing with you, you should really learn about sarcasm.
Charles would be a bit too good for Vander at 190 for mine. Holyfield had all of 18 fights total at the weight while Charles carried 190 or so pretty well. I'd favor the roided up heavyweight version over Charles tho i wouldn't count Charles out.
Before he hit the roids I'd take a prime Charles to outpoint him, if he could handle Archie Moore easily more than once, he'd handle a young Holyfield