Two of the best and most accurate combination counter-puncher of any era that will feint you to death and made you pay if you make any mistakes Holyfield made Tyson think twice about just rushing in and throwing punches, JMM made Packy think twice about just rushing in and throwing wild punches. So who is the better combination counter-puncher, finisher and overall fighter? Explain your answer.
Don't throw Tyson name in there. Tyson done a lot of stupid **** but being on the juice isn't one of them. Just look at him when he was 15, dude was bigger than most grown men. PAC , jjm , Evan fields ...I don't know
Too many biased mexicans and chicanos or just generations born in the 90s voting on JMM because they DKSAB?
I have to say Holyfield. As far as counter-punching in combinations goes, Holyfield typically threw more, accurate shots when he exploded with his counter attack than Marquez. It is a close call though.
Evander was more explosive and a wee bit sharper with his shots; Marquez was more cerebral and used more angles. I prefer Marquez for that matter, but Evander had that wow factor, like when he unloaded on Foreman, so for that matter I'm going with a draw.
Hard to pick one or the other. We're talking about the best aggressive counterpunching assasins in the last 30+ years! I consider myself fortunate to have witnessed both their primes! Elite ATG's both of them!:bbb
I think Evander. Douglas was a nice fight for a counterpunch, and then you have JMM counterpunching Pacman. But Evander fought everyone. It is comparable. I am curious to see how JMM does against Bradley, and if Bradley uses his speed correctly. At the moment I think JMM beats Bradley by knockout.
