I have often thought that Mike Tyson is a fighter who had the talent to be a top 3 all time heavyweight but failed to realize it due to having the wrong mental characteristics. I also think that Evander Holyfield with an average work ethic would never have cracked the top 30 heavyweights of all time. Lets take the idea that Mike Tyson has Evander Holyfields personality and Evander Holyfield has Mike Tysons personality. How do their careers unfold.
Tyson would more than likely gone up until 1997 with an undefeated record/1 blemish with anywhere from 25-28 title defenses/title wins. Putting him atop the ATG lists. Holyfield on the other hand would have been a promising young prospect who'd be a titlist but nothing more.
Tyson is talented but not really any more talented than other heavies. Ali, Louis, Marciano, Holmes, Foreman, Lewis, Holyfield and Liston were BEASTS with amazing talent and physical assets. Tyson generally is no more talented than any of the great heavyweights. Tysons tools is no more sensational either. His technique is some of the best ever. At what he does, he does well BUT he doesn't do everything. As much as he knows about boxing he is also no more intelligent than the greats above. Tyson has typical talent, tools and intelligence amongst great. Nothing special and infact inferior, hence the fact he wasn't as great as the guys above.
List all those fighters that you mentioned above, do a Poll (Tyson included) and see who the consensus thinks is the most talented.
The consensus doesn't matter. It is a consensus myth. It is irrefutable that Tyson is not more talented than them. The only thing Tyson had that was special was technique. At what he did, he was amazing but that is it.
I agree. Tyson wouldn't find himself in jail, married to an idiot, letting the money go for him, surrounding himself with mooks - all things are possible for him basically. Give Hollyfield Tyson's reaction time and punches for the Bowe fight and he destroys him. Buster Douglas loses a wide decision, probably, Hollyfield would have seen what Buster was up to and adjusted I guess. The Tyson-Hollyfield fights are to complicated for me to take on :huh As to Hollyfield, he is beaten at Cruiser and wins a couple of odd ones at HW before faiding into bolivian.
He is. My point is he hasn't got some special level of talent, nor is his talent or physical assets any more superior. Louis has good height, reach, strength, speed and power. Ali has height, reach, exceptionally fast feet, hands, reflexes and strength. Foreman and Lewis and had exceptional height and reach, coupled with sensational strength and power. Liston had an amazing reach, great strength and debilitating power. Dempsey was from the school of Louis and Tyson. He had great speed to power ratio.
I'm not sure it would have mattered much, at least long term. Work ethic or no, fighters with Tyson's come-forward-at-all-times style have relatively short life spans in the ring. Train all you want, you're still going to burn out sooner than a guy who can shift down once in a while and regulate the amount of energy (and punishment) he takes and expends. This matters hugely.
My thoughts exactly. While he would've been greater, Holyfield (if he has his own brain) would always give him some trouble, as would Lewis because they would face off when Tyson probably lost a step. Just because he has Holyfields brain doesn't make him impervious to father time with his come-forward style. And although the 3 year prison lay off didn't help his timing etc, it did "preserve" him a bit. For instance, Joe Louis seemed to be burnt out a bit by his huge activity level between '39-'42. Tyson was fighting 3 times a year from '87, always good, ranked opponents, he may have continued that up to '92 but not without losing something.
I would suggest that with Hollyfield brain inside his head (this is getting a bit macabre) Tyson wouldn't be that come forward at all times fighter. That would have been THE major weapon, but not the only one.
............What options would he have had? To quote something I read in a boxing magazine once, when you're a 5'11" heavyweight with a 70" reach, you don't have a Plan B. Given his physical attributes, he's not turning into a jab and dance man.
Quite right. Of course, it's not for me to say - i'm no mastermind - but I bet a figher like Hollyfield could have turned Mike into a decent inside-counterpuncher (a good chest-chest fighter, which Tyson never was). I think Tyson could also become a decent part time bring him fighter, forcing his opponent onto the front foot with positionting with what Tyson has. I wouldn't suggest this as a tactic to win Mike's body (wrong) a round but it could certainly get him a decent "in" against an awkward opponent (Bonecrusher Smith for example) if it was done right.
I think a better proposition would be to put Evanders testicles in Tysons protector cup,if you did that Tyson would likely still be champion!