Even if Floyd beat Pac, would he leapfrog Pac in ATG status?

It's only simple to simple minded ****s like you. Boxing is a hugley complex sport. You just don't get it because it's easier to accept an easy explanation. You're a ****in rube in other words. :deal

 

its me breaking it down in its simpliest form for you. A man can understand chemistry but a kid may need every problem simplified

its not 1 win, its two fighters meeting in thier prime 1 of them atleast to prove who Pound for Pound the #1 fighter is. The Winner is the better fighter.

Thats what boxing is about finding out who the best is. Look jinkee this does nothing to pacs accomplishments he still will be great
But that guy that beat him in his prime(who is no longer in his) is greater

 

It is that simply the better man wins

Its nothing to sneeze at to lose to a man that has never lost a fight

 

See, the thing is, you aren't breaking anything down. Nothing. You haven't even given a proper post on the topic. ATG status isn't defined by H2H matchups. You're simplifying it to your standard. Maybe you just aren't smart enough to understand something as complex as boxing.

 

I second that. People can hate all they want, but when the winner comes out, nobody can say anything and they have to give him their respect

 

OK... I'm sure you think Zahir raheem is better them Morales huh? Chris Johns better then JMM. Junior Jones is GREATER then MAB right? Antonio Tarver SHITS on RJJ! Dave Tiberi is GREATER then James Tony too! Same with Corey T-Putt sanders...he's greater then Wlad!!!

I can keep going, but you probably can't keep up.

 

HELL NO!

Even if Floyd KO PAc, and both fighter retired after that, PAc resume is still Gabillion miles ahead of Floyd.

 

Mayweather is already higher ATG than Pac. Not by a lot, but he's ahead of him.

 

If Mosley came out and knocked the **** out of Manny, I would not say he's the better fighter. Or if Manny went out and lost to Berto, I wouldn't say Berto ranks higher, (though he may be the new p4p king at the time or number 2). Now if you get a fighter who has accomplished as much as Floyd has and who is the runner up and in many minds the leader in fighter of the decade, then you have to give it to him. These two have been trying to establish who the best is for a while and because of Manny's weight hopping, he is seen as better because they haven't fought yet, but if Floyd goes and dominates him, then we know who the best is.
I bet you if Floyd and Manny fought last year and Floyd won, I bet he would be fighter of the decade. Do you argue that?

 

are you comparing floyd, (a 5 division champion) to Leon Spinks, and an ancient Ali to Manny Pac?

 

Depends how he beats Pac.

 

Yes.

Wont be that hard as you can pick a lot of holes in Pacs recent resume, as you can with Floyds, but he's no catchweight king like Pac, he also doesnt feed of fighters who have just been destroyed and are past their best.

 

Ill stop insulting you because your starting to sound intelligent.
Ok buddy
so the thing is, Their acomplishments are very Close, Little Guys moving up in weight making Big Guys look stupid. Now They are the Big Guys and Its #1 and #2 Fighter of the Decade.
Even if you take the fake catchweight bull**** titles pac won they are damn near dead even in accomplishments just diffrent names on the resume
If they fight, and pac is in his prime now this determines who the greater fighter is all is damn near even and with floyds zero you cant say much about who is greater

 

****in hell... Look, praise Floyd all you want. But don't post this **** and expect to be taken serious.